H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 4-2

Jakob Hlasek holds a 4–2 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet, while Jakob Hlasek leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1996 Grand Slam Cup fourth round 2-6 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 2
6 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Dec 7, 1996* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals R16 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #74 2-6 6-3 6-4 Cedric Pioline #21 Match data
Feb 1, 1996* Zagreb ATP 250 R32 Carpet Cedric Pioline #62 6-2 5-7 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #42 Match data
Jun 17, 1994* Halle ATP 250 R16 Grass Jakob Hlasek #57 6-3 6-1 Cedric Pioline #15 Match data
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Cedric Pioline #14 6-4 3-6 6-4 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #58 Match data
Mar 3, 1993* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jakob Hlasek #30 6-7(2) 7-6(3) 7-5 Cedric Pioline #26 Match data
Mar 5, 1992* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jakob Hlasek #24 7-5 6-2 Cedric Pioline #51 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5