H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Christian Saceanu H2H: 2-2
Jakob Hlasek and Christian Saceanu are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Christian Saceanu leads 2–0 on grass, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Christian Saceanu won the 1992 Wimbledon third round 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Christian Saceanu | 7-6(3) 3-6 6-3 1-6 6-3 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1991* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | SF | Grass | Christian Saceanu | 6-3 3-6 7-6(5) | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Mar 9, 1991* | Copenhagen | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Christian Saceanu | Match data |
| Jul 13, 1988* | Stuttgart Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Clay | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 6-2 | Christian Saceanu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Christian Saceanu | #1,093 | #60 | 509 | 1,709 | 71 | 112 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Christian Saceanu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #479 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #84 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #88 | 1,654 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #160 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #153 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #84 | 1,563 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #530 | 1,454 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #289 | 1,485 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |