H2H data updated: 2026-09-09 00:00 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs David De Miguel H2H: 1-0

Jakob Hlasek holds a 1–0 lead over David De Miguel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1987 Toulouse round of 32 6-1 7-5.

SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 61 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jakob Hlasek #33 6-1 7-5 David De Miguel Match data Oct 15, 1987* R32 Toulouse ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
David De Miguel 1,561 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek David De Miguel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,516 0 0
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0
23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5
27 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jakob Hlasek David De Miguel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3%
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1985 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1986 6 11 17 35.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1987 0 2 2 0.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3% 1988 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1989 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1990 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3%
27 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
29 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5%
30 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9%
31 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0%
Career 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 29 44 34.1% 0 2 2 0.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jakob Hlasek David De Miguel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1516 114.8 +52 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 -0.29
18 1983 1567 112.2 +8 +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84
19 1984 1648 128.9 +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04 1984 1528 116.8 +39 44.4% -0.67 1–0 1–1 +0.05
20 1985 1785 145.6 +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17 1985 1544 120.1 +22 50.0% +0.25 0–2 +0.24
21 1986 1733 142.9 -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10 1986 1542 116.2 +38 36.6% -0.80 2–3 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 100.0 +0.82
22 1987 1865 151.8 +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72 1987 1477 101.4 +50 30.0% -1.63 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 96.6 +0.79
23 1988 2050 159.4 +34 -279 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83 1988 1481 100.8 50.0% +0.25 +0.34
24 1989 1795 146.3 +95 -38 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85 1989 1477 107.2 0.0% -2.00 -0.22
25 1990 1938 151.4 +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05 1990 1462 105.9 0.0% -2.75 0–1 -0.10
26 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58
27 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64 1992 1455 102.6 0.0% -2.50 -0.05
28 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57
29 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32
30 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57
31 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84
Career 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94 1562 118.4 +38 35.2% -0.95 3–8 (27%) 6–5 (55%) 96.2 +3.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.