H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs David Rikl H2H: 1-1
Jakob Hlasek and David Rikl are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Rikl won the 1996 Auckland third round 7-6(2) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 11, 1996* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Rikl | 7-6(2) 6-2 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1994* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 4-6 7-5 6-1 | David Rikl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |