H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Fernando Luna H2H: 0-1

Fernando Luna holds a 1–0 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Fernando Luna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Luna won the 1989 Hamburg Open round of 32 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Fernando Luna
ESP Age 68 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Fernando Luna #86 6-4 7-6 Jakob Hlasek #8 Match data May 11, 1989* R32 Hamburg Open ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Fernando Luna #723 #33 310 1,779 167 160 51.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Fernando Luna
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1977 1–1 50.0% #322 1,511 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0 1978 2–2 50.0% #340 1,541 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1979 5–9 35.7% #87 1,517 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0 1980 18–13 58.1% #66 1,708 0 0
23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2 1981 17–15 53.1% #81 1,694 0 0
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1982 23–18 56.1% #60 1,724 0 0
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4 1983 19–13 59.4% #53 1,733 0 0
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5 1984 12–14 46.2% #70 1,646 0 0
27 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5 1985 10–14 41.7% #111 1,620 0 0
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1986 19–14 57.6% #52 1,690 0 0
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5 1987 4–6 40.0% #261 1,644 0 0
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1988 18–12 60.0% #59 1,705 0 0
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5 1989 11–16 40.7% #135 1,566 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 1990 8–10 44.4% #110 1,588 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 1991 0–3 0.0% #356 1,535 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jakob Hlasek Fernando Luna
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1978 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1979 — — — — 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
22 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1980 — — — — 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — — — — —
23 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3% 1981 — — — — 17 15 32 53.1% — — — — — — — —
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1982 — — — — 23 18 41 56.1% — — — — — — — —
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1983 — — — — 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — — — — —
26 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 1984 — — — — 12 14 26 46.2% — — — — — — — —
27 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1985 — — — — 10 14 24 41.7% — — — — — — — —
28 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1986 — — — — 19 14 33 57.6% — — — — — — — —
29 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1987 — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1988 — — — — 18 11 29 62.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1989 — — — — 11 15 26 42.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 — — — — 8 10 18 44.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7% — 0 1 1 0.0% 167 157 324 51.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jakob Hlasek Fernando Luna
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -159 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04 1977 1512 110.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.75 — — — +0.06
20 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17 1978 1541 122.3 — — — — — +41 — 60.0% +1.10 0–2 — — -0.24
21 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10 1979 1517 119.6 — — — — — +31 — 43.3% -0.23 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) 95.7 +1.17
22 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72 1980 1708 148.6 — — — — — +22 — 54.3% +0.33 5–3 (63%) 3–1 (75%) 104.7 -1.05
23 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83 1981 1695 133.7 — — — — — +19 — 49.4% +0.10 10–6 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 98.7 +1.18
24 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85 1982 1725 145.1 — — — — — +18 — 52.7% +0.30 4–4 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 100.9 -0.88
25 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05 1983 1733 134.9 — — — — — +26 — 57.7% +0.86 7–3 (70%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +2.65
26 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58 1984 1647 140.1 — — — — — +41 — 47.5% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) 94.7 -0.03
27 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64 1985 1620 133.2 — — — — — +19 — 42.4% -0.15 5–4 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 99.2 -1.21
28 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57 1986 1691 141.4 — — — — — +38 — 57.5% +0.71 4–5 (44%) 5–6 (45%) 98.6 +0.24
29 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32 1987 1644 114.7 — — — — — +31 — 40.0% -1.10 — 1–0 — -0.15
30 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57 1988 1706 136.6 — — — — — +48 — 58.7% +0.56 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.63
31 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84 1989 1566 117.8 — — — — — +22 — 46.0% -0.14 2–5 (29%) 6–4 (60%) 96.1 +0.28
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1588 130.6 — — — — — +37 — 43.9% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–5 (17%) 97.5 -0.14
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 1536 93.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — — — 12.5% -2.88 0–1 1–1 — +0.23
Career — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94 — 1779 144.3 -2.58 +0.12 0.731 42.6% — +29 — 50.7% +0.24 44–43 (51%) 32–47 (41%) 93.6 +0.84

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.