H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Francisco Maciel H2H: 1-0
Jakob Hlasek holds a 1–0 lead over Francisco Maciel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1992 Barcelona Olympics second round 6-3 6-4 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 62
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 31, 1992* | Barcelona Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Clay | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 6-4 4-6 6-2 | Francisco Maciel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 393 | 302 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Francisco Maciel | #873 | #35 | 130 | 1,680 | 33 | 45 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Francisco Maciel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #71 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #56 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #271 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #353 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,870 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #375 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,752 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |