H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Henri Leconte H2H: 3-2

Jakob Hlasek holds a 3–2 lead over Henri Leconte in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 3–1 on carpet, while Henri Leconte leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1994 Montpellier Open round of 32 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main draw meetings
Henri Leconte
FRA Age 63 Left-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jakob Hlasek #60 6-3 6-1 Henri Leconte #77 Match data Oct 20, 1994* R32 Montpellier Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Henri Leconte #72 6-3 7-6(6) Jakob Hlasek #41 Match data Apr 21, 1993* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay
Jakob Hlasek #48 (w/o) Henri Leconte #74 Match data Nov 8, 1992* QF Paris Masters Masters 1000 Carpet
Henri Leconte #13 7-6 7-6 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #8 Match data Nov 27, 1988* F Brussels ATP 250 Carpet
Jakob Hlasek #15 6-4 7-5 Henri Leconte #12 Match data Nov 13, 1988* SF Wembley ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Henri Leconte #1,355 #5 948 2,064 346 244 58.6% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Henri Leconte
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1980 0–4 0.0% #440 1,461 0 0
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 1981 3–6 33.3% — 1,481 0 0
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1982 31–21 59.6% #29 1,852 0 1
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1983 35–23 60.3% #30 1,828 0 1
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0 1984 26–18 59.1% #27 1,867 0 2
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1985 44–21 67.7% #16 1,933 0 4
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0 1986 38–14 73.1% #6 1,973 0 6
23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2 1987 23–16 59.0% #21 1,844 0 6
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1988 48–20 70.6% #9 1,925 0 8
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4 1989 10–11 47.6% #115 1,792 0 8
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5 1990 25–17 59.5% #30 1,797 0 8
27 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5 1991 8–12 40.0% #161 1,717 0 8
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1992 18–16 52.9% #61 1,820 0 8
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5 1993 13–11 54.2% #101 1,840 0 9
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1994 16–16 50.0% #94 1,741 0 9
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5 1995 8–14 36.4% #134 1,635 0 9
32 — — — — — — — 1996 0–4 0.0% #1001 1,560 0 9

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jakob Hlasek Henri Leconte
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1982 19 7 26 73.1% 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1983 14 8 22 63.6% 16 9 25 64.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
20 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1984 8 6 14 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
21 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1985 10 7 17 58.8% 19 7 26 73.1% 13 4 17 76.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1986 7 2 9 77.8% 19 4 23 82.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 3 6 9 33.3%
23 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3% 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1988 8 5 13 61.5% 24 7 31 77.4% 3 1 4 75.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 5 5 10 50.0%
26 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 5 11 54.5%
29 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1993 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 3 3 6 50.0%
30 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1994 3 3 6 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1995 3 2 5 60.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7% — 85 64 149 57.0% 146 95 241 60.6% 56 29 85 65.9% 59 56 115 51.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's and 120/136 of Henri Leconte's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jakob Hlasek Henri Leconte
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
26 1991 59/70 6.2 3.0 59.2% 76.4% 50.7% 62.0% 41.9% 65.7% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 39/49 5.7 3.5 58.5% 73.5% 48.4% 61.2% 44.3% 62.8% 39.2% 1991 19/20 7.2 5.3 46.5% 74.1% 50.9% 60.1% 48.7% 61.7% 39.2%
28 1993 40/45 5.2 4.0 57.6% 74.3% 47.4% 58.3% 41.3% 62.8% 36.3% 1992 27/34 7.6 3.7 52.3% 77.5% 52.8% 65.7% 45.7% 65.7% 40.2%
29 1994 38/46 5.2 4.3 59.0% 72.7% 49.9% 54.1% 49.7% 63.2% 35.8% 1993 21/24 5.8 5.6 50.8% 73.6% 49.4% 62.4% 39.5% 61.8% 35.7%
30 1995 49/59 6.3 3.6 59.4% 73.4% 47.6% 59.9% 37.5% 63.3% 37.4% 1994 29/32 5.4 4.2 48.1% 74.7% 51.4% 58.2% 43.0% 62.6% 39.6%
31 1996 38/47 6.7 3.0 59.8% 74.5% 49.3% 53.3% 39.6% 64.1% 34.1% 1995 21/22 5.0 4.6 50.4% 67.4% 47.9% 51.5% 36.6% 57.8% 35.3%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 3/4 3.3 5.3 40.9% 67.5% 44.9% 52.1% 25.0% 53.7% 33.1%
Career — 263/695 5.9 3.5 58.9% 74.3% 48.9% 58.5% 42.1% 63.8% 36.7% — 120/590 6.1 4.6 49.5% 73.6% 50.5% 59.6% 42.3% 62.0% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jakob Hlasek Henri Leconte
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1462 107.0 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.64 0–1 0–1 — -0.03
17 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29 1981 1481 112.5 — — — — — — +123 40.7% -0.74 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — +0.37
18 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84 1982 1853 153.1 — — — — +3 -263 -281 53.3% +0.41 11–6 (65%) 10–9 (53%) 111.7 -1.69
19 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04 1983 1829 160.3 — — — — +21 -60 — 57.7% +0.77 12–9 (57%) 4–9 (31%) 99.2 -5.74
20 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17 1984 1867 156.9 — — — — +15 -26 — 57.7% +0.57 7–7 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 98.4 -2.73
21 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10 1985 1934 153.7 — — — — -90 -6 -68 65.9% +1.15 9–7 (56%) 11–15 (42%) 98.9 -0.38
22 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72 1986 1973 155.3 — — — — -103 +24 -3 71.7% +1.39 6–5 (55%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 -1.49
23 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83 1987 1844 139.2 — — — — +4 +40 +96 58.2% +0.56 8–7 (53%) 13–10 (57%) 98.8 +1.37
24 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85 1988 1925 151.1 — — — — -40 +57 -10 63.2% +0.85 14–1 (93%) 15–12 (56%) 110.6 -1.80
25 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05 1989 1792 131.0 — — — — -11 +138 — 46.9% -0.02 5–3 (63%) 4–4 (50%) 98.3 -0.39
26 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58 1990 1797 147.6 — — — — -76 +181 +71 61.2% +0.68 7–9 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 94.6 -0.20
27 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64 1991 1717 126.0 +1.97 -1.02 1.023 50.6% -76 +146 +147 51.0% +0.43 2–6 (25%) 2–5 (29%) 91.2 +0.35
28 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57 1992 1821 151.3 +3.52 +2.24 1.171 52.9% -59 -12 +50 58.9% +0.86 6–5 (55%) 9–7 (56%) 102.5 -1.65
29 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32 1993 1841 136.9 +1.37 -0.47 0.935 48.7% -131 -60 +120 51.5% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–3 (63%) 104.3 -3.12
30 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57 1994 1742 142.8 +1.00 +2.00 1.059 51.0% -13 -31 +182 54.1% +0.50 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.2 -1.94
31 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84 1995 1636 122.3 -2.33 -1.40 0.837 46.9% +104 +2 +161 38.5% -0.85 3–6 (33%) 4–2 (67%) 95.9 -1.19
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1561 92.6 -3.49 -2.03 0.714 43.1% — — — 10.0% -3.10 0–1 1–0 — +0.47
Career — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94 — 2064 155.4 +1.09 +0.45 1.001 50.0% -27 +11 +40 58.0% +0.61 103–86 (54%) 107–100 (52%) 101.5 -3.37

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.