H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Jeff Tarango H2H: 1-0

Jakob Hlasek holds a 1–0 lead over Jeff Tarango in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1992 Moscow third round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Jeff Tarango
USA Age 57 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 12, 1992* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #39 6-3 7-5 Jeff Tarango #43 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jeff Tarango #1,001 #42 877 1,787 239 293 44.9% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Jeff Tarango
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1987 1–2 33.3% #377 1,507 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1988 7–6 53.8% #96 1,598 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0 1989 10–11 47.6% #137 1,647 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1990 11–17 39.3% #131 1,606 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1991 16–23 41.0% #106 1,612 0 0
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1992 28–24 53.8% #45 1,694 0 2
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1993 24–26 48.0% #91 1,670 0 2
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1994 23–27 46.0% #78 1,654 0 2
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1995 18–24 42.9% #76 1,661 0 2
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 1996 14–18 43.8% #106 1,620 0 2
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1997 31–29 51.7% #49 1,692 0 2
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1998 24–29 45.3% #73 1,660 0 2
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1999 21–24 46.7% #55 1,685 0 2
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5 2000 10–24 29.4% #112 1,515 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2001 1–8 11.1% #323 1,452 0 2
33 — — — — — — — 2002 0–1 0.0% #730 1,446 0 2