H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Jeremy Bates H2H: 2-0
Jakob Hlasek holds a 2–0 lead over Jeremy Bates in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1990 Milan fourth round 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 64
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 9, 1990* | Milan | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | Jeremy Bates | Match data |
| Nov 6, 1986* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 6-7 6-4 7-6 | Jeremy Bates | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Jeremy Bates | #1,314 | #54 | 700 | 1,717 | 116 | 174 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Jeremy Bates | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #372 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #372 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #341 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #329 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,397 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1985 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #99 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #187 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #89 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 14–18 | 43.8% | #152 | 1,617 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 13–12 | 52.0% | #96 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 6–18 | 25.0% | #126 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #168 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #105 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #98 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #77 | 1,617 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 12–22 | 35.3% | #143 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #600 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |