H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Jimmy Arias H2H: 3-1

Jakob Hlasek holds a 3–1 lead over Jimmy Arias in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 3–0 on hard courts, while Jimmy Arias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1991 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Jimmy Arias
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 7, 1991* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jakob Hlasek #18 6-1 6-1 Jimmy Arias #64 Match data
Aug 9, 1990* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Jakob Hlasek #33 3-6 6-2 6-3 Jimmy Arias #57 Match data
Jul 28, 1990* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jakob Hlasek #47 7-5 6-1 Jimmy Arias #60 Match data
May 10, 1990* Hamburg Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Jimmy Arias #70 6-4 2-6 6-2 Jakob Hlasek #37 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jimmy Arias #714 #5 587 2,067 281 217 56.4% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Jimmy Arias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 3–5 37.5% #255 1,530 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 10–10 50.0% #84 1,626 0 0
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 1982 30–17 63.8% #21 1,858 0 1
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1983 47–15 75.8% #6 2,045 0 5
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1984 35–19 64.8% #14 1,879 0 5
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0 1985 32–21 60.4% #21 1,810 0 5
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1986 18–19 48.6% #48 1,668 0 5
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1987 22–18 55.0% #34 1,720 0 5
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1988 7–14 33.3% #106 1,615 0 5
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1989 17–17 50.0% #92 1,696 0 5
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1990 24–26 48.0% #60 1,681 0 5
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1991 23–19 54.8% #63 1,691 0 5
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 1992 4–8 33.3% #195 1,644 0 5
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1993 5–4 55.6% #178 1,664 0 5
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1994 3–4 42.9% #334 1,638 0 5
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5 — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — 1998 1–1 50.0% #711 1,640 0 5