H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Jimmy Connors H2H: 2-3

Jimmy Connors holds a 3–2 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jimmy Connors leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1991 Grand Slam Cup fourth round 0-6 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 3
5 main draw meetings
Jimmy Connors
USA Age 73 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Dec 14, 1991* Grand Slam Cup ATP Finals R16 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #20 0-6 6-4 6-4 Jimmy Connors #49 Match data
Oct 15, 1988* Toulouse ATP 250 SF Hard Jimmy Connors #9 5-7 7-6 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #25 Match data
Oct 9, 1988* Basel ATP 250 SF Hard Jakob Hlasek #27 6-4 3-6 6-1 Jimmy Connors #11 Match data
Aug 13, 1988* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 R16 Hard Jimmy Connors #6 6-1 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #28 Match data
Jul 20, 1985* Washington ATP 250 QF Clay Jimmy Connors #4 6-2 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #54 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Jimmy Connors #1,295 #1 875 2,410 1,262 294 81.1% 8 1 1 0 99 109

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Jimmy Connors
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 1970 5–4 55.6% — 1,557 0 0
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1971 23–13 63.9% — 1,769 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1972 76–25 75.2% — 1,991 0 6
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0 1973 86–16 84.3% #3 2,152 0 17
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1974 95–6 94.1% #1 2,301 3 32
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1975 79–10 88.8% #1 2,260 3 41
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1976 97–8 92.4% #1 2,370 4 53
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1977 69–15 82.1% #1 2,271 4 61
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1978 67–6 91.8% #1 2,326 5 71
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1979 78–12 86.7% #2 2,272 5 79
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 1980 73–15 83.0% #3 2,197 5 85
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1981 59–12 83.1% #2 2,162 5 89
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1982 78–11 87.6% #2 2,263 7 96
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1983 52–11 82.5% #3 2,193 8 100
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5 1984 69–12 85.2% #2 2,240 8 105
32 — — — — — — — 1985 45–15 75.0% #4 2,133 8 105
33 — — — — — — — 1986 46–15 75.4% #8 2,013 8 105
34 — — — — — — — 1987 52–19 73.2% #4 1,985 8 105
35 — — — — — — — 1988 40–11 78.4% #7 2,020 8 107
36 — — — — — — — 1989 31–13 70.5% #14 1,957 8 109
37 — — — — — — — 1990 0–3 0.0% #936 1,881 8 109
38 — — — — — — — 1991 19–14 57.6% #49 1,887 8 109
39 — — — — — — — 1992 17–16 51.5% #84 1,774 8 109
40 — — — — — — — 1993 3–5 37.5% #370 1,717 8 109
41 — — — — — — — 1994 1–3 25.0% #672 1,681 8 109
42 — — — — — — — 1995 2–2 50.0% #419 1,673 8 109
43 — — — — — — — 1996 0–1 0.0% #1300 1,665 8 109