H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs John Fitzgerald H2H: 2-1

Jakob Hlasek holds a 2–1 lead over John Fitzgerald in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1987 Wimbledon first round 6-1 6-4 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
John Fitzgerald
AUS Age 65 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 24, 1987* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jakob Hlasek #32 6-1 6-4 7-6 John Fitzgerald #100 Match data
Aug 14, 1985* Montreal / Toronto Masters 1000 R64 Hard Jakob Hlasek #45 6-2 5-7 6-4 John Fitzgerald #37 Match data
Dec 29, 1984* Melbourne ATP 250 SF Grass John Fitzgerald #37 7-5 6-3 Jakob Hlasek #91 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
John Fitzgerald #765 #25 321 1,857 230 221 51.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek John Fitzgerald
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1979 1–4 20.0% #305 1,470 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1980 4–8 33.3% #136 1,522 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0 1981 26–24 52.0% #60 1,674 0 1
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1982 22–22 50.0% #78 1,696 0 2
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1983 32–19 62.7% #43 1,790 0 4
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1984 27–19 58.7% #37 1,786 0 5
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1985 16–21 43.2% #91 1,665 0 5
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1986 8–11 42.1% #102 1,654 0 5
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1987 18–18 50.0% #73 1,679 0 5
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 1988 36–19 65.5% #25 1,778 0 6
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1989 15–18 45.5% #117 1,651 0 6
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1990 6–13 31.6% #188 1,587 0 6
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1991 5–7 41.7% #205 1,610 0 6
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5 1992 10–11 47.6% #166 1,618 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1993 4–5 44.4% #298 1,582 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1994 0–1 0.0% #792 1,575 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1995 0–1 0.0% #765 1,570 0 6