H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Karsten Braasch H2H: 1-1

Jakob Hlasek and Karsten Braasch are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Karsten Braasch leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karsten Braasch won the 1994 Auckland quarterfinal 6-2 6-4.

SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 1
2 main draw meetings
GER Age 59 Left-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 15, 1994* Auckland ATP 250 QF Hard Karsten Braasch #64 6-2 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #75 Match data
Oct 22, 1993* Lyon ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #46 6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 Karsten Braasch #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Karsten Braasch #1,445 #38 878 1,731 68 93 42.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Karsten Braasch
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,516 0 0
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1989 2–3 40.0% #226 1,512 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1990 0–1 0.0% #257 1,494 0 0
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1991 2–3 40.0% #146 1,525 0 0
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1992 7–14 33.3% #90 1,528 0 0
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1993 14–16 46.7% #62 1,649 0 0
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1994 26–31 45.6% #56 1,597 0 0
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 1995 9–14 39.1% #167 1,591 0 0
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1996 0–1 0.0% #489 1,576 0 0
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1997 2–3 40.0% #200 1,619 0 0
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1998 3–4 42.9% #271 1,604 0 0
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5 1999 1–2 33.3% #261 1,591 0 0
32 2000 2–1 66.7% #437 1,605 0 0