H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Luiz Mattar H2H: 1-0
Jakob Hlasek holds a 1–0 lead over Luiz Mattar in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1995 Auckland third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BRA
Age 62
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1995* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 6-1 6-2 | Luiz Mattar | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Luiz Mattar | #888 | #29 | 796 | 1,772 | 176 | 161 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Luiz Mattar | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #38 | 1,696 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #44 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #62 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #43 | 1,696 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #113 | 1,635 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 21–16 | 56.8% | #51 | 1,718 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #73 | 1,696 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #404 | 1,593 | 0 | 7 |