H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Martin Jaite H2H: 2-2
Jakob Hlasek and Martin Jaite are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Martin Jaite leads 2–0 on clay, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1989 Paris Indoor fourth round 4-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 61
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3, 1989* | Paris Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 4-6 6-3 6-4 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
| Apr 27, 1989* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-4 6-1 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Feb 18, 1987* | Indian Wells | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 6-7 6-2 6-4 | Martin Jaite | Match data |
| Apr 28, 1986 | Indianapolis | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Martin Jaite | 6-2 6-4 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Martin Jaite | #1,214 | #10 | 1,226 | 1,965 | 272 | 157 | 63.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Martin Jaite | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #285 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 11–8 | 57.9% | #56 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #20 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 34–15 | 69.4% | #17 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #14 | 1,890 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #54 | 1,731 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 46–14 | 76.7% | #11 | 1,947 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #36 | 1,767 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 24–21 | 53.3% | #46 | 1,706 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #120 | 1,678 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #245 | 1,601 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |