Jakob Hlasek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 1 | 14 | 15 | Aug 12, 1993 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 10 | 11 | Dec 15, 1991 | H2H |
| Guy Forget | 2 | 8 | 10 | Feb 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 4 | 5 | 9 | Mar 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 4 | 4 | 8 | Nov 8, 1996 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC
Mats Wilander holds a 5–2 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 2–1 on carpet, while Mats Wilander leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1991 Brussels round of 16 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | 6-1 7-5 | Mats Wilander | Match data | Feb 15, 1991* | R16 | Brussels | ATP Championship Series → modern equivalent ATP 500 | Carpet |
| Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 6-2 | Mats Wilander | Match data | Oct 31, 1990* | R64 | Paris Masters | Masters 1000 | Carpet |
| Mats Wilander | 6-3 6-2 6-4 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data | Feb 26, 1987* | R32 | Miami Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Mats Wilander | 6-3 6-0 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data | Feb 22, 1987* | QF | Indian Wells Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
| Mats Wilander | 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) | Jakob Hlasek | Match data | Oct 25, 1985* | R16 | Tokyo Indoor | ATP 250 | Carpet |
| Mats Wilander | 7-5 6-4 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data | Sep 21, 1985* | QF | Geneva Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
| Mats Wilander | 7-5 6-4 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data | May 2, 1985* | R32 | Hamburg Open | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 393 | 302 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Mats Wilander | #1,354 | #1 | 1,075 | 2,263 | 526 | 203 | 72.2% | 7 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 20 | 33 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #283 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 13–10 | 56.5% | #73 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 56–16 | 77.8% | #8 | 2,020 | 1 | 4 |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 71–11 | 86.6% | #4 | 2,247 | 2 | 13 |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 49–12 | 80.3% | #4 | 2,179 | 3 | 16 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,097 | 4 | 19 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 46–13 | 78.0% | #3 | 2,055 | 4 | 21 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 65–17 | 79.3% | #3 | 2,084 | 4 | 26 |
| 23 | 1988 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 51–9 | 85.0% | #1 | 2,180 | 7 | 32 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #12 | 1,928 | 7 | 32 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #41 | 1,897 | 7 | 33 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,870 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #159 | 1,769 | 7 | 33 |
| 27 | 1992 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #330 | 1,697 | 7 | 33 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #129 | 1,653 | 7 | 33 |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #46 | 1,767 | 7 | 33 |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,753 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #196 | 1,680 | 7 | 33 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% |
| 17 | 1982 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 18 | 6 | 24 | 75.0% | 34 | 4 | 38 | 89.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% |
| 18 | 1983 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1983 | 19 | 3 | 22 | 86.4% | 39 | 2 | 41 | 95.1% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 1984 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1984 | 14 | 2 | 16 | 87.5% | 21 | 5 | 26 | 80.8% | 7 | 1 | 8 | 87.5% | 7 | 4 | 11 | 63.6% |
| 20 | 1985 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1985 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 37 | 5 | 42 | 88.1% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% |
| 21 | 1986 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 1986 | 21 | 4 | 25 | 84.0% | 13 | 4 | 17 | 76.5% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 9 | 4 | 13 | 69.2% |
| 22 | 1987 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1987 | 15 | 6 | 21 | 71.4% | 34 | 3 | 37 | 91.9% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 12 | 6 | 18 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 1988 | 22 | 7 | 29 | 75.9% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 1988 | 29 | 2 | 31 | 93.5% | 17 | 3 | 20 | 85.0% | 4 | 1 | 5 | 80.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 24 | 1989 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 1989 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 13 | 5 | 18 | 72.2% | 7 | 2 | 9 | 77.8% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% |
| 25 | 1990 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 1990 | 15 | 8 | 23 | 65.2% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% |
| 26 | 1991 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 1991 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 27 | 1992 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1993 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 29 | 1994 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1994 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 45.5% | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1995 | 14 | 9 | 23 | 60.9% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 31 | 1996 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1996 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 7 | 5 | 12 | 58.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% |
| Career | — | 149 | 115 | 264 | 56.4% | 75 | 70 | 145 | 51.7% | 36 | 31 | 67 | 53.7% | 133 | 86 | 219 | 60.7% | — | 186 | 71 | 257 | 72.4% | 236 | 68 | 304 | 77.6% | 45 | 16 | 61 | 73.8% | 59 | 48 | 107 | 55.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's and 107/123 of Mats Wilander's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 26 | 1991 | 59/70 | 6.2 | 3.0 | 59.2% | 76.4% | 50.7% | 62.0% | 41.9% | 65.7% | 37.0% | 1991 | 17/19 | 3.1 | 1.3 | 62.5% | 65.8% | 50.4% | 54.4% | 45.3% | 59.1% | 34.4% |
| 27 | 1992 | 39/49 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 58.5% | 73.5% | 48.4% | 61.2% | 44.3% | 62.8% | 39.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 40/45 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 57.6% | 74.3% | 47.4% | 58.3% | 41.3% | 62.8% | 36.3% | 1993 | 9/10 | 3.1 | 2.6 | 61.1% | 66.0% | 43.5% | 61.7% | 36.3% | 57.4% | 35.6% |
| 29 | 1994 | 38/46 | 5.2 | 4.3 | 59.0% | 72.7% | 49.9% | 54.1% | 49.7% | 63.2% | 35.8% | 1994 | 30/37 | 3.1 | 3.0 | 64.0% | 65.9% | 46.2% | 55.9% | 51.7% | 58.7% | 38.0% |
| 30 | 1995 | 49/59 | 6.3 | 3.6 | 59.4% | 73.4% | 47.6% | 59.9% | 37.5% | 63.3% | 37.4% | 1995 | 35/39 | 3.1 | 2.1 | 68.9% | 66.4% | 45.9% | 56.2% | 48.2% | 60.0% | 40.0% |
| 31 | 1996 | 38/47 | 6.7 | 3.0 | 59.8% | 74.5% | 49.3% | 53.3% | 39.6% | 64.1% | 34.1% | 1996 | 16/18 | 2.3 | 2.1 | 62.9% | 66.9% | 46.6% | 58.3% | 39.9% | 59.4% | 41.1% |
| Career | — | 263/695 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 58.9% | 74.3% | 48.9% | 58.5% | 42.1% | 63.8% | 36.7% | — | 107/729 | 3.0 | 2.3 | 65.0% | 66.2% | 46.6% | 56.6% | 46.5% | 59.2% | 38.3% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Mats Wilander | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 1497 | 120.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +36 | — | 33.3% | -1.17 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | -0.25 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1663 | 137.2 | — | — | — | — | +15 | -79 | -104 | 54.2% | +0.25 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.23 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1516 | 114.8 | — | — | — | — | +52 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.00 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.29 | 1982 | 2020 | 162.4 | — | — | — | — | -182 | +108 | -398 | 71.9% | +1.39 | 11–7 (61%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | -2.88 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1567 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | +34 | 46.7% | -0.03 | 2–1 (67%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.84 | 1983 | 2248 | 172.9 | — | — | — | — | -208 | +33 | -287 | 78.3% | +2.21 | 12–2 (86%) | 12–11 (52%) | — | -4.52 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1648 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -160 | +14 | 43.7% | -0.39 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +1.04 | 1984 | 2180 | 167.5 | — | — | — | — | -83 | +62 | -105 | 71.0% | +1.24 | 13–3 (81%) | 18–6 (75%) | — | -3.48 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1785 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -156 | -119 | 54.0% | +0.12 | 7–5 (58%) | 10–7 (59%) | — | -1.17 | 1985 | 2098 | 165.1 | — | — | — | — | -58 | +153 | -23 | 71.8% | +1.45 | 13–6 (68%) | 12–4 (75%) | — | -3.35 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1733 | 142.9 | — | — | — | — | -50 | +67 | -41 | 55.9% | +0.32 | 11–10 (52%) | 16–10 (62%) | — | +0.10 | 1986 | 2055 | 160.6 | — | — | — | — | +34 | +96 | +11 | 68.8% | +1.29 | 8–3 (73%) | 9–6 (60%) | — | -1.36 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1865 | 151.8 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -128 | -111 | 58.0% | +0.44 | 7–5 (58%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -2.72 | 1987 | 2084 | 170.5 | — | — | — | — | +5 | +137 | -68 | 73.2% | +1.66 | 7–3 (70%) | 13–11 (54%) | — | -4.55 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2050 | 159.4 | — | — | — | — | +34 | -279 | — | 64.7% | +0.98 | 18–5 (78%) | 15–15 (50%) | — | -1.83 | 1988 | 2180 | 162.6 | — | — | — | — | +45 | +57 | -195 | 77.7% | +1.76 | 12–2 (86%) | 15–8 (65%) | — | -1.42 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1795 | 146.3 | — | — | — | — | +95 | -38 | — | 55.5% | +0.60 | 8–10 (44%) | 8–14 (36%) | — | -0.85 | 1989 | 1929 | 145.4 | — | — | — | — | +51 | +210 | +61 | 63.3% | +0.82 | 8–3 (73%) | 10–8 (56%) | — | -0.07 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1938 | 151.4 | — | — | — | — | +52 | -214 | -223 | 59.5% | +0.50 | 12–7 (63%) | 15–11 (58%) | — | -0.05 | 1990 | 1897 | 152.5 | — | — | — | — | +39 | +195 | — | 59.3% | +0.72 | 6–3 (67%) | 2–4 (33%) | — | -2.18 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1871 | 151.6 | +3.96 | -0.75 | 1.078 | 51.3% | +40 | -73 | -130 | 59.6% | +0.57 | 15–8 (65%) | 20–19 (51%) | — | -0.58 | 1991 | 1769 | 129.1 | -0.51 | -2.42 | 0.841 | 46.9% | +151 | +167 | — | 50.0% | -0.30 | 2–2 (50%) | 5–2 (71%) | — | -0.37 |
| 27 | 1992 | 1793 | 147.3 | +1.45 | +1.86 | 1.055 | 50.6% | +38 | -51 | -34 | 51.2% | +0.10 | 9–5 (64%) | 5–14 (26%) | — | -1.64 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 1714 | 144.6 | +1.45 | -0.65 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +42 | -38 | +41 | 44.5% | -0.09 | 10–7 (59%) | 10–14 (42%) | — | -1.57 | 1993 | 1697 | 115.7 | -1.61 | -1.46 | 0.836 | 47.1% | +125 | +183 | — | 37.0% | -0.93 | 1–2 (33%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | -0.40 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1677 | 138.4 | +1.07 | -1.27 | 0.973 | 49.5% | +6 | -6 | +136 | 45.4% | -0.19 | 6–2 (75%) | 11–10 (52%) | — | -1.32 | 1994 | 1653 | 131.2 | -1.73 | -0.29 | 0.920 | 48.7% | +76 | +109 | — | 47.5% | -0.29 | 7–10 (41%) | 3–4 (43%) | — | -0.64 |
| 30 | 1995 | 1783 | 142.6 | +1.21 | +0.39 | 1.019 | 50.3% | -17 | -53 | — | 53.3% | +0.30 | 11–11 (50%) | 18–13 (58%) | — | -1.57 | 1995 | 1768 | 148.4 | -0.95 | +2.28 | 0.999 | 49.9% | +44 | -65 | +195 | 49.5% | 0.00 | 9–3 (75%) | 7–9 (44%) | — | -1.55 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1753 | 139.5 | +1.73 | -2.17 | 0.951 | 48.9% | -38 | -49 | +20 | 47.5% | -0.16 | 3–9 (25%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | -1.84 | 1996 | 1680 | 121.0 | -1.79 | +2.24 | 1.010 | 50.1% | +11 | +25 | — | 41.5% | -0.32 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | -0.59 |
| Career | — | 2062 | 152.1 | +1.95 | -0.42 | 1.014 | 50.1% | +20 | -84 | -20 | 54.0% | +0.28 | 125–90 (58%) | 159–152 (51%) | 103.8 | -1.94 | — | 2263 | 165.2 | -1.28 | +0.49 | 0.939 | 48.9% | -16 | +94 | -98 | 66.8% | +1.13 | 113–55 (67%) | 121–89 (58%) | 105.7 | -3.77 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 1 | 14 | 15 | Aug 12, 1993 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 10 | 11 | Dec 15, 1991 | H2H |
| Guy Forget | 2 | 8 | 10 | Feb 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 4 | 5 | 9 | Mar 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 4 | 4 | 8 | Nov 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 11 | 9 | 20 | Jul 27, 1995 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 6 | 13 | 19 | May 13, 1994 | H2H |
| Joakim Nystrom | 12 | 1 | 13 | Aug 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Jan Gunnarsson | 9 | 2 | 11 | Mar 7, 1990 | H2H |
| John McEnroe | 6 | 5 | 11 | Jul 7, 1989 | H2H |