H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Mats Wilander H2H: 2-5

Mats Wilander holds a 5–2 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 2–1 on carpet, while Mats Wilander leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1991 Brussels fourth round 6-1 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 5
7 main draw meetings
Mats Wilander
SWE Age 61 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 15, 1991* Brussels ATP 250 R16 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #15 6-1 7-5 Mats Wilander #80 Match data
Oct 31, 1990* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #29 6-3 6-2 Mats Wilander #40 Match data
Feb 26, 1987* Key Biscayne Masters 1000 R32 Hard Mats Wilander #5 6-3 6-2 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #26 Match data
Feb 22, 1987* Indian Wells Masters 1000 QF Hard Mats Wilander #5 6-3 6-0 Jakob Hlasek #32 Match data
Oct 25, 1985* Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 R16 Carpet Mats Wilander #3 6-3 3-6 7-6(2) Jakob Hlasek #44 Match data
Sep 21, 1985* Geneva ATP 250 QF Clay Mats Wilander #3 7-5 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #41 Match data
May 2, 1985* Hamburg ATP 250 R32 Clay Mats Wilander #4 7-5 6-4 Jakob Hlasek #58 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Mats Wilander #1,354 #1 1,075 2,262 526 203 72.2% 7 6 0 0 20 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Mats Wilander
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1980 1–4 20.0% #283 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1981 13–10 56.5% #73 1,662 0 0
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 1982 56–16 77.8% #8 2,020 1 4
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1983 71–11 86.6% #4 2,246 2 13
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1984 49–12 80.3% #4 2,177 3 16
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0 1985 65–17 79.3% #3 2,108 4 19
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1986 46–13 78.0% #3 2,056 4 21
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1987 65–17 79.3% #3 2,082 4 26
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1988 51–9 85.0% #1 2,152 7 32
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1989 31–15 67.4% #12 1,922 7 32
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1990 21–13 61.8% #41 1,894 7 33
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1991 9–10 47.4% #159 1,767 7 33
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1993 3–7 30.0% #330 1,695 7 33
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1994 17–20 45.9% #129 1,652 7 33
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1995 21–18 53.8% #46 1,766 7 33
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5 1996 7–11 38.9% #196 1,679 7 33