H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Miloslav Mecir H2H: 1-4
Miloslav Mecir holds a 4–1 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Miloslav Mecir leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1987 Wembley quarterfinal 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
4
5 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 62
Right-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 15, 1987* | Wembley | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 6-3 | Miloslav Mecir | Match data |
| Sep 7, 1987* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Miloslav Mecir | 6-4 6-4 2-6 6-4 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Sep 20, 1986* | Hamburg | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Miloslav Mecir | 6-0 6-2 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Mar 24, 1985* | Rotterdam | ATP 250 | F | Carpet | Miloslav Mecir | 6-1 6-2 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Jan 30, 1985* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R64 | Carpet | Miloslav Mecir | 6-4 6-3 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Miloslav Mecir | #116 | #4 | 677 | 2,179 | 232 | 108 | 68.2% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Miloslav Mecir | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 11–5 | 68.8% | #100 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #50 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #9 | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 40–17 | 70.2% | #9 | 1,938 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 68–18 | 79.1% | #6 | 1,977 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 29–13 | 69.0% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #116 | 1,794 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |