Jakob Hlasek
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 1 | 14 | 15 | Aug 12, 1993 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 10 | 11 | Dec 15, 1991 | H2H |
| Guy Forget | 2 | 8 | 10 | Feb 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 4 | 5 | 9 | Mar 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 4 | 4 | 8 | Nov 8, 1996 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Jakob Hlasek and Peter Doohan are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Peter Doohan leads 1–0 on clay, while Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1986 Wimbledon round of 128 6-1 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | 6-1 6-2 6-3 | Peter Doohan | Match data | Jun 25, 1986* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Peter Doohan | 6-3 7-5 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data | May 9, 1985* | R32 | Forest Hills | ATP 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 393 | 302 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Peter Doohan | #1,102 | #43 | 140 | 1,737 | 50 | 82 | 37.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #480 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #363 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1988 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #85 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #101 | 1,682 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 0–7 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,555 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,870 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #72 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1992 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,793 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #187 | 1,485 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 1989 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #172 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,677 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #331 | 1,435 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1131 | 1,427 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,753 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1097 | 1,421 | 0 | 1 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 17 | 1982 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 1979 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 6 | 5 | 11 | 54.5% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1980 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1985 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 9 | 6 | 15 | 60.0% | 1981 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1986 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 18 | 8 | 26 | 69.2% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 1982 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1987 | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | 10 | 6 | 16 | 62.5% | 1983 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1988 | 22 | 7 | 29 | 75.9% | 8 | 4 | 12 | 66.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 15 | 3 | 18 | 83.3% | 1984 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 8 | 3 | 11 | 72.7% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1989 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 13 | 6 | 19 | 68.4% | 1985 | 4 | 9 | 13 | 30.8% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | 12 | 8 | 20 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 1990 | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 5 | 6 | 11 | 45.5% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 17 | 7 | 24 | 70.8% | 1986 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1991 | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 18 | 10 | 28 | 64.3% | 1987 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22.2% | — | — | — | — | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 1992 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 10 | 7 | 17 | 58.8% | 1988 | 1 | 8 | 9 | 11.1% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 44.4% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 9 | 8 | 17 | 52.9% | 1989 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | 1994 | 9 | 9 | 18 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 5 | 8 | 13 | 38.5% | 1990 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 13 | 12 | 25 | 52.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 5 | 3 | 8 | 62.5% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 149 | 115 | 264 | 56.4% | 75 | 70 | 145 | 51.7% | 36 | 31 | 67 | 53.7% | 133 | 86 | 219 | 60.7% | — | 8 | 37 | 45 | 17.8% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 38 | 35 | 73 | 52.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's and 2/2 of Peter Doohan's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 26 | 1991 | 59/70 | 6.2 | 3.0 | 59.2% | 76.4% | 50.7% | 62.0% | 41.9% | 65.7% | 37.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1992 | 39/49 | 5.7 | 3.5 | 58.5% | 73.5% | 48.4% | 61.2% | 44.3% | 62.8% | 39.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1993 | 40/45 | 5.2 | 4.0 | 57.6% | 74.3% | 47.4% | 58.3% | 41.3% | 62.8% | 36.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 38/46 | 5.2 | 4.3 | 59.0% | 72.7% | 49.9% | 54.1% | 49.7% | 63.2% | 35.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 49/59 | 6.3 | 3.6 | 59.4% | 73.4% | 47.6% | 59.9% | 37.5% | 63.3% | 37.4% | 1991 | 1/1 | 7.0 | 8.0 | 65.8% | 65.3% | 51.3% | 42.9% | 50.0% | 60.5% | 25.8% |
| 31 | 1996 | 38/47 | 6.7 | 3.0 | 59.8% | 74.5% | 49.3% | 53.3% | 39.6% | 64.1% | 34.1% | 1992 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 4.0 | 66.7% | 55.9% | 58.8% | 40.0% | — | 56.9% | 18.2% |
| Career | — | 263/695 | 5.9 | 3.5 | 58.9% | 74.3% | 48.9% | 58.5% | 42.1% | 63.8% | 36.7% | — | 2/132 | 4.0 | 6.0 | 66.2% | 60.6% | 55.1% | 41.4% | 25.0% | 58.7% | 22.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Peter Doohan | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1516 | 114.8 | — | — | — | — | +52 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.00 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 1567 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | +8 | — | +34 | 46.7% | -0.03 | 2–1 (67%) | 4–1 (80%) | — | +0.84 | 1979 | 1492 | 99.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.67 | — | — | — | -0.08 |
| 19 | 1984 | 1648 | 128.9 | — | — | — | — | +9 | -160 | +14 | 43.7% | -0.39 | 5–4 (56%) | 5–6 (45%) | — | +1.04 | 1980 | 1494 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | 25.0% | -1.63 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.01 |
| 20 | 1985 | 1785 | 145.6 | — | — | — | — | +2 | -156 | -119 | 54.0% | +0.12 | 7–5 (58%) | 10–7 (59%) | — | -1.17 | 1981 | 1485 | 113.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20.0% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | -0.30 |
| 21 | 1986 | 1733 | 142.9 | — | — | — | — | -50 | +67 | -41 | 55.9% | +0.32 | 11–10 (52%) | 16–10 (62%) | — | +0.10 | 1982 | 1506 | 112.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +15 | 46.2% | +0.23 | — | 1–4 (20%) | — | +0.42 |
| 22 | 1987 | 1865 | 151.8 | — | — | — | — | +13 | -128 | -111 | 58.0% | +0.44 | 7–5 (58%) | 8–6 (57%) | — | -2.72 | 1983 | 1501 | 111.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | +33 | 28.6% | 0.00 | — | 0–2 | — | +0.19 |
| 23 | 1988 | 2050 | 159.4 | — | — | — | — | +34 | -279 | — | 64.7% | +0.98 | 18–5 (78%) | 15–15 (50%) | — | -1.83 | 1984 | 1614 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | -73 | -99 | +60 | 53.1% | +0.02 | 3–4 (43%) | 7–4 (64%) | — | +1.08 |
| 24 | 1989 | 1795 | 146.3 | — | — | — | — | +95 | -38 | — | 55.5% | +0.60 | 8–10 (44%) | 8–14 (36%) | — | -0.85 | 1985 | 1683 | 129.4 | — | — | — | — | -157 | -162 | +79 | 51.2% | +0.01 | 1–8 (11%) | 5–3 (63%) | — | +0.42 |
| 25 | 1990 | 1938 | 151.4 | — | — | — | — | +52 | -214 | -223 | 59.5% | +0.50 | 12–7 (63%) | 15–11 (58%) | — | -0.05 | 1986 | 1555 | 90.8 | — | — | — | — | — | -80 | — | 0.0% | -3.09 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.41 |
| 26 | 1991 | 1871 | 151.6 | +3.96 | -0.75 | 1.078 | 51.3% | +40 | -73 | -130 | 59.6% | +0.57 | 15–8 (65%) | 20–19 (51%) | — | -0.58 | 1987 | 1619 | 131.2 | — | — | — | — | -147 | — | +163 | 45.6% | -0.29 | 5–5 (50%) | 8–9 (47%) | — | -0.16 |
| 27 | 1992 | 1793 | 147.3 | +1.45 | +1.86 | 1.055 | 50.6% | +38 | -51 | -34 | 51.2% | +0.10 | 9–5 (64%) | 5–14 (26%) | — | -1.64 | 1988 | 1485 | 100.1 | — | — | — | — | -71 | — | +180 | 31.0% | -1.17 | 2–3 (40%) | 2–3 (40%) | — | +1.01 |
| 28 | 1993 | 1714 | 144.6 | +1.45 | -0.65 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +42 | -38 | +41 | 44.5% | -0.09 | 10–7 (59%) | 10–14 (42%) | — | -1.57 | 1989 | 1451 | 100.7 | — | — | — | — | -54 | — | — | 14.3% | -1.78 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.50 |
| 29 | 1994 | 1677 | 138.4 | +1.07 | -1.27 | 0.973 | 49.5% | +6 | -6 | +136 | 45.4% | -0.19 | 6–2 (75%) | 11–10 (52%) | — | -1.32 | 1990 | 1435 | 98.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.40 | — | — | — | -0.10 |
| 30 | 1995 | 1783 | 142.6 | +1.21 | +0.39 | 1.019 | 50.3% | -17 | -53 | — | 53.3% | +0.30 | 11–11 (50%) | 18–13 (58%) | — | -1.57 | 1991 | 1428 | 101.8 | +1.97 | -1.36 | 0.654 | 44.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -1.67 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.04 |
| 31 | 1996 | 1753 | 139.5 | +1.73 | -2.17 | 0.951 | 48.9% | -38 | -49 | +20 | 47.5% | -0.16 | 3–9 (25%) | 13–12 (52%) | — | -1.84 | 1992 | 1422 | 100.9 | -2.70 | -1.59 | 0.421 | 38.9% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | -0.07 |
| Career | — | 2062 | 152.1 | +1.95 | -0.42 | 1.014 | 50.1% | +20 | -84 | -20 | 54.0% | +0.28 | 125–90 (58%) | 159–152 (51%) | 103.8 | -1.94 | — | 1738 | 123.6 | -0.37 | -1.48 | 0.532 | 41.9% | -114 | -112 | +99 | 40.4% | -0.57 | 13–21 (38%) | 23–31 (43%) | 93.6 | +2.49 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | 1 | 14 | 15 | Aug 12, 1993 | H2H |
| Ivan Lendl | 1 | 10 | 11 | Dec 15, 1991 | H2H |
| Guy Forget | 2 | 8 | 10 | Feb 16, 1996 | H2H |
| Anders Jarryd | 4 | 5 | 9 | Mar 10, 1994 | H2H |
| Goran Ivanisevic | 4 | 4 | 8 | Nov 8, 1996 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brad Drewett | 4 | 2 | 6 | Jan 31, 1987 | H2H |
| Brad Gilbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Sep 27, 1990 | H2H |
| Boris Becker | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 26, 1987 | H2H |
| Miloslav Mecir | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 1, 1987 | H2H |
| Kevin Curren | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 12, 1992 | H2H |