H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Richard Krajicek H2H: 1-3
Richard Krajicek holds a 3–1 lead over Jakob Hlasek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Richard Krajicek leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Richard Krajicek won the 1993 Stuttgart Indoor fourth round 7-5 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
NED
Age 54
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1993* | Stuttgart Indoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 7-5 5-7 6-4 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Feb 11, 1993* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Richard Krajicek | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Jan 10, 1992* | Sydney Outdoor | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 6-4 6-4 | Richard Krajicek | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1991* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Richard Krajicek | 6-2 6-4 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Richard Krajicek | #1,044 | #4 | 3,130 | 2,044 | 408 | 207 | 66.3% | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 17 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Richard Krajicek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #45 | 1,745 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 47–24 | 66.2% | #10 | 1,950 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–20 | 64.3% | #15 | 1,888 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 32–13 | 71.1% | #17 | 1,883 | 0 | 7 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,832 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 46–24 | 65.7% | #7 | 1,876 | 1 | 10 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #11 | 1,969 | 1 | 13 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 1998 | 45–16 | 73.8% | #10 | 1,975 | 1 | 15 |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | 1999 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #10 | 1,879 | 1 | 17 |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #36 | 1,885 | 1 | 17 |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | 2002 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #112 | 1,839 | 1 | 17 |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | 2003 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #147 | 1,762 | 1 | 17 |