H2H data updated: 2026-09-07 00:00 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Richey Reneberg H2H: 2-1

Jakob Hlasek holds a 2–1 lead over Richey Reneberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet, while Richey Reneberg leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Richey Reneberg won the 1996 Libéma Open round of 16 6-1 6-7(4) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Richey Reneberg
USA Age 60 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Richey Reneberg #30 6-1 6-7(4) 7-6(6) Jakob Hlasek #43 Match data Jun 14, 1996* R16 Libéma Open World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Jakob Hlasek #27 3-6 7-6 6-4 6-0 Richey Reneberg #31 Match data Aug 29, 1990* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Jakob Hlasek #12 6-7 6-3 6-2 Richey Reneberg #70 Match data Oct 20, 1989* R32 Tokyo Indoor ATP 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Richey Reneberg #867 #20 1,333 1,920 305 262 53.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Richey Reneberg
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0 1986 2–3 40.0% #337 1,512 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1987 15–13 53.6% #79 1,671 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0 1988 14–19 42.4% #128 1,676 0 0
23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2 1989 23–21 52.3% #80 1,690 0 0
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1990 37–25 59.7% #23 1,821 0 0
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4 1991 32–18 64.0% #27 1,801 0 1
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5 1992 18–20 47.4% #95 1,712 0 1
27 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5 1993 37–26 58.7% #30 1,756 0 2
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1994 33–24 57.9% #34 1,809 0 2
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5 1995 22–23 48.9% #57 1,775 0 2
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1996 37–25 59.7% #32 1,799 0 3
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5 1997 18–20 47.4% #73 1,680 0 3
32 — — — — — — — 1998 10–15 40.0% #154 1,595 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 1999 6–9 40.0% #202 1,625 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2000 1–1 50.0% #573 1,630 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jakob Hlasek Richey Reneberg
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1986 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1988 4 8 12 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5%
23 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3% 1989 17 10 27 63.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1990 20 13 33 60.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 7 20 65.0%
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1991 12 8 20 60.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3%
26 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 1992 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1993 26 13 39 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 5 6 11 45.5%
28 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1994 25 13 38 65.8% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3%
29 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1995 11 14 25 44.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1996 18 15 33 54.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
31 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0% 1997 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7% — 171 140 311 55.0% 43 43 86 50.0% 39 29 68 57.4% 52 50 102 51.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's and 342/395 of Richey Reneberg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jakob Hlasek Richey Reneberg
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 44/50 3.7 2.9 58.8% 69.8% 50.2% 57.7% 46.9% 61.5% 40.0%
26 1991 59/70 6.2 3.0 59.2% 76.4% 50.7% 62.0% 41.9% 65.7% 37.0% 1992 35/38 4.0 3.0 56.6% 71.6% 49.4% 58.4% 41.5% 61.9% 37.3%
27 1992 39/49 5.7 3.5 58.5% 73.5% 48.4% 61.2% 44.3% 62.8% 39.2% 1993 57/63 4.2 2.1 54.4% 72.8% 53.8% 57.1% 47.2% 64.1% 42.2%
28 1993 40/45 5.2 4.0 57.6% 74.3% 47.4% 58.3% 41.3% 62.8% 36.3% 1994 51/57 4.6 2.4 54.5% 71.7% 53.1% 53.9% 45.2% 62.8% 41.3%
29 1994 38/46 5.2 4.3 59.0% 72.7% 49.9% 54.1% 49.7% 63.2% 35.8% 1995 38/45 5.3 3.0 52.5% 71.3% 51.5% 58.0% 36.8% 62.0% 37.5%
30 1995 49/59 6.3 3.6 59.4% 73.4% 47.6% 59.9% 37.5% 63.3% 37.4% 1996 52/62 4.9 2.5 54.6% 72.9% 53.0% 62.6% 51.7% 63.7% 40.3%
31 1996 38/47 6.7 3.0 59.8% 74.5% 49.3% 53.3% 39.6% 64.1% 34.1% 1997 29/38 5.2 2.4 55.9% 72.4% 52.2% 58.1% 37.2% 63.5% 35.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 21/25 5.8 3.7 56.8% 69.4% 48.4% 60.7% 38.8% 60.4% 37.0%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 13/15 6.3 3.3 55.6% 72.8% 47.9% 46.8% 39.5% 61.8% 38.4%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 2.5 0.5 48.7% 69.0% 50.6% 64.3% 33.3% 59.6% 40.8%
Career — 263/695 5.9 3.5 58.9% 74.3% 48.9% 58.5% 42.1% 63.8% 36.7% — 342/567 4.6 2.7 55.3% 71.7% 51.7% 57.7% 44.1% 62.7% 39.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jakob Hlasek Richey Reneberg
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17 1986 1512 107.9 — — — — — +15 — 33.3% -0.33 2–0 0–1 — +0.23
21 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10 1987 1672 145.5 — — — — -22 -111 -30 54.2% +0.40 2–4 (33%) 6–10 (38%) 100.4 -1.09
22 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72 1988 1677 138.5 — — — — -20 -76 -41 45.5% -0.19 1–5 (17%) 0–5 (0%) 91.9 -2.96
23 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83 1989 1691 146.0 — — — — +32 -131 -6 52.6% +0.34 6–8 (43%) 8–6 (57%) 99.7 -2.41
24 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85 1990 1822 152.0 — — — — +35 -278 -123 56.1% +0.54 13–8 (62%) 9–9 (50%) 103.8 -0.36
25 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05 1991 1801 136.9 +1.06 +1.57 1.040 50.8% +19 -158 -128 56.7% +0.32 16–7 (70%) 18–10 (64%) 108.7 +1.77
26 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58 1992 1712 137.1 +0.01 -0.27 0.979 49.4% +15 — -40 50.0% -0.10 5–8 (38%) 9–4 (69%) 101.0 +0.14
27 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64 1993 1757 149.2 +1.89 +3.46 1.174 52.9% +20 -183 -68 58.3% +0.77 6–9 (40%) 9–13 (41%) 95.4 +0.80
28 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57 1994 1810 145.9 +1.16 +3.35 1.110 51.8% +16 -205 -128 57.6% +0.59 8–10 (44%) 11–5 (69%) 101.8 -0.33
29 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32 1995 1775 141.8 +0.54 +0.52 0.988 49.5% +7 -140 -93 49.1% +0.04 5–6 (45%) 10–8 (56%) 100.5 -2.47
30 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57 1996 1800 153.8 +1.89 +2.79 1.110 51.9% -7 -121 +20 55.6% +0.52 14–8 (64%) 12–12 (50%) 103.0 -3.44
31 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84 1997 1681 138.4 +1.16 -0.37 0.980 49.5% +6 -19 +159 48.9% -0.08 9–7 (56%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.18
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1596 119.7 -1.25 -0.80 0.936 48.8% +52 +19 +180 43.3% -0.34 4–5 (44%) 3–2 (60%) 99.0 +1.17
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1626 124.0 -0.07 +0.69 1.005 50.3% +16 — +87 44.7% -0.40 1–4 (20%) 3–3 (50%) 95.8 -0.78
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1630 106.1 0.00 -0.50 1.009 50.3% — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — -0.10
Career — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94 — 1920 150.0 +0.99 +1.68 1.057 50.9% +15 -127 -13 52.9% +0.28 92–89 (51%) 107–97 (52%) 102.3 -1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.