H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Thierry Tulasne H2H: 4-0
Jakob Hlasek holds a 4–0 lead over Thierry Tulasne in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1990 Nice third round 3-6 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 63
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 1990* | Nice | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jakob Hlasek | 3-6 6-4 6-4 | Thierry Tulasne | Match data |
| Oct 27, 1988* | Paris Indoor | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 6-4 7-6 | Thierry Tulasne | Match data |
| Apr 24, 1986* | Monte Carlo | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 7-6 | Thierry Tulasne | Match data |
| Nov 8, 1985* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jakob Hlasek | 6-3 6-3 | Thierry Tulasne | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Thierry Tulasne | #1,117 | #10 | 334 | 1,937 | 215 | 206 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakob Hlasek | Thierry Tulasne | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #579 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #113 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #59 | 1,675 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #95 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #82 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #54 | 1,721 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #23 | 1,878 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #20 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #57 | 1,684 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #75 | 1,675 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #127 | 1,607 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 1990 | 5–13 | 27.8% | #158 | 1,532 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #374 | 1,493 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |