H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Thomas Hogstedt H2H: 3-1

Jakob Hlasek holds a 3–1 lead over Thomas Hogstedt in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 3–0 on carpet, while Thomas Hogstedt leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Thomas Hogstedt won the 1989 Wimbledon first round 6-3 7-6 6-1.

SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
SWE Age 62 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 1989* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Thomas Hogstedt #119 6-3 7-6 6-1 Jakob Hlasek #9 Match data
Mar 20, 1986* Brussels ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #24 6-1 1-6 6-3 Thomas Hogstedt #196 Match data
Mar 13, 1986* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #28 6-4 6-2 Thomas Hogstedt #154 Match data
Mar 28, 1985* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #72 6-2 7-6 Thomas Hogstedt #136 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Thomas Hogstedt #1,032 #38 413 1,736 90 153 37.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Thomas Hogstedt
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1979 1–1 50.0% #368 1,521 0 0
17 1982 1–2 33.3% 1,516 0 0 1981 1–1 50.0% #549 1,538 0 0
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1982 9–10 47.4% #82 1,588 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1983 15–16 48.4% #63 1,690 0 1
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0 1984 10–16 38.5% #84 1,639 0 1
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1985 3–10 23.1% #210 1,520 0 1
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1986 2–8 20.0% #124 1,504 0 1
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1987 8–15 34.8% #179 1,508 0 1
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1988 3–4 42.9% #159 1,521 0 1
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1989 8–10 44.4% #133 1,613 0 1
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1990 12–26 31.6% #91 1,509 0 1
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 1991 11–23 32.4% #130 1,518 0 1
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1992 5–8 38.5% #181 1,547 0 1
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1993 0–2 0.0% #306 1,530 0 1
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1994 2–3 40.0% #309 1,546 0 1
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5