H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 3-1

Jakob Hlasek holds a 3–1 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1996 Moscow third round 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 57 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 7, 1996* Moscow ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #76 7-6(6) 6-2 Tomas Carbonell #75 Match data
Mar 16, 1995* St. Petersburg ATP 250 R32 Carpet Jakob Hlasek #76 7-6(4) 3-6 6-1 Tomas Carbonell #64 Match data
Jun 2, 1991* Roland Garros Grand Slam R32 Clay Jakob Hlasek #20 7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 6-3 Tomas Carbonell #81 Match data
Apr 25, 1990* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Tomas Carbonell #54 6-3 6-1 Jakob Hlasek #36 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,776 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Tomas Carbonell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,558 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,623 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,708 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,623 0 0
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,658 0 1
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,580 0 1
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,639 0 1
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,677 0 1
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,585 0 2
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,619 0 2
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,581 0 2
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5 — — — — — — —