H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Tomas Carbonell H2H: 3-1

Jakob Hlasek holds a 3–1 lead over Tomas Carbonell in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1996 Moscow round of 32 7-6(6) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main draw meetings
Tomas Carbonell
ESP Age 58 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jakob Hlasek #76 7-6(6) 6-2 Tomas Carbonell #75 Match data Nov 7, 1996* R32 Moscow World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Jakob Hlasek #76 7-6(4) 3-6 6-1 Tomas Carbonell #64 Match data Mar 16, 1995* R32 St. Petersburg ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Carpet
Jakob Hlasek #20 7-6(7) 4-6 6-4 6-3 Tomas Carbonell #81 Match data Jun 2, 1991* R32 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Tomas Carbonell #54 6-3 6-1 Jakob Hlasek #36 Match data Apr 25, 1990* R64 Monte-Carlo Masters Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Tomas Carbonell #860 #40 900 1,777 193 222 46.5% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Tomas Carbonell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 1986 1–3 25.0% #404 1,480 0 0
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1987 4–3 57.1% #242 1,559 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1988 7–7 50.0% #209 1,573 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0 1989 15–15 50.0% #77 1,624 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1990 25–23 52.1% #76 1,709 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0 1991 14–26 35.0% #96 1,624 0 0
23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2 1992 21–19 52.5% #65 1,659 0 1
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1993 18–28 39.1% #89 1,581 0 1
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4 1994 28–27 50.9% #62 1,640 0 1
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5 1995 26–26 50.0% #74 1,679 0 1
27 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5 1996 21–25 45.7% #75 1,584 0 2
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1997 8–13 38.1% #170 1,576 0 2
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5 1998 5–5 50.0% #167 1,618 0 2
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1999 0–2 0.0% #826 1,580 0 2
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jakob Hlasek Tomas Carbonell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1987 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — —
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 0 2 2 0.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
20 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 13 9 22 59.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 18 16 34 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1991 9 11 20 45.0% 4 10 14 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3% 1992 2 3 5 40.0% 19 13 32 59.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1993 5 10 15 33.3% 13 15 28 46.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1994 3 4 7 42.9% 21 17 38 55.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
26 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3% 1995 0 1 1 0.0% 21 19 40 52.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 5 8 37.5%
27 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 14 14 28 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9%
28 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 1997 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
29 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5% 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
30 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 1999 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7% — 31 49 80 38.8% 141 133 274 51.5% 5 10 15 33.3% 16 30 46 34.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 263/316 of Jakob Hlasek's and 283/312 of Tomas Carbonell's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jakob Hlasek Tomas Carbonell
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1991 37/40 2.4 2.3 65.9% 62.7% 47.5% 45.4% 50.6% 57.7% 39.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 35/40 1.6 5.2 69.1% 63.1% 38.6% 51.2% 47.0% 55.5% 43.3%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 40/46 2.1 5.1 68.3% 63.7% 44.2% 56.1% 43.8% 57.4% 42.4%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 50/55 2.0 4.4 70.1% 63.6% 44.7% 52.9% 47.6% 58.0% 42.8%
26 1991 59/70 6.2 3.0 59.2% 76.4% 50.7% 62.0% 41.9% 65.7% 37.0% 1995 47/52 3.5 3.5 64.2% 66.0% 46.7% 50.6% 43.9% 58.7% 41.6%
27 1992 39/49 5.7 3.5 58.5% 73.5% 48.4% 61.2% 44.3% 62.8% 39.2% 1996 44/46 3.6 3.1 65.8% 65.9% 47.9% 55.4% 46.3% 59.2% 38.4%
28 1993 40/45 5.2 4.0 57.6% 74.3% 47.4% 58.3% 41.3% 62.8% 36.3% 1997 19/21 3.8 4.0 65.4% 66.2% 44.8% 47.9% 57.5% 59.0% 42.0%
29 1994 38/46 5.2 4.3 59.0% 72.7% 49.9% 54.1% 49.7% 63.2% 35.8% 1998 10/10 4.2 3.9 62.4% 66.0% 45.4% 55.0% 38.8% 58.0% 40.4%
30 1995 49/59 6.3 3.6 59.4% 73.4% 47.6% 59.9% 37.5% 63.3% 37.4% 1999 1/2 0.0 4.0 77.3% 51.7% 47.1% 50.0% 50.0% 50.7% 33.3%
31 1996 38/47 6.7 3.0 59.8% 74.5% 49.3% 53.3% 39.6% 64.1% 34.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 263/695 5.9 3.5 58.9% 74.3% 48.9% 58.5% 42.1% 63.8% 36.7% — 283/415 2.7 3.9 67.0% 64.4% 45.1% 51.9% 46.9% 57.9% 41.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jakob Hlasek Tomas Carbonell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29 1986 1481 99.8 — — — — — +28 — 36.4% -0.91 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.40
18 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84 1987 1559 121.2 — — — — — +30 — 47.4% -0.89 2–0 1–0 — -0.21
19 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04 1988 1574 120.3 — — — — — +79 — 50.0% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — +0.60
20 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17 1989 1624 135.5 — — — — -172 +101 -3 50.0% +0.04 3–6 (33%) 4–5 (44%) 96.3 +0.46
21 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10 1990 1709 141.7 — — — — -128 +42 — 52.7% +0.34 4–5 (44%) 7–6 (54%) 99.7 -0.63
22 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72 1991 1624 131.0 -2.01 +0.62 0.927 48.4% -30 +35 — 40.2% -0.52 4–9 (31%) 4–11 (27%) 90.5 -2.85
23 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83 1992 1660 134.9 -4.31 +2.88 0.973 49.4% -103 +102 — 45.7% -0.28 12–3 (80%) 4–5 (44%) 110.9 +0.61
24 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85 1993 1582 138.9 -2.57 +2.91 0.995 49.8% -40 +125 — 43.7% -0.34 7–12 (37%) 5–6 (45%) 96.1 -1.48
25 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05 1994 1640 136.7 -2.35 +2.94 1.018 50.4% -88 +89 — 52.6% +0.08 11–12 (48%) 8–7 (53%) 101.4 +0.63
26 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58 1995 1679 133.7 -1.80 +2.24 1.008 50.0% -117 +39 -53 47.0% -0.10 14–6 (70%) 5–9 (36%) 104.5 -0.06
27 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64 1996 1584 131.9 -1.67 -0.34 0.941 48.7% -22 +61 +63 43.9% -0.49 11–5 (69%) 9–8 (53%) 107.4 -0.23
28 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57 1997 1576 125.5 -1.64 +1.61 1.024 50.3% -5 +73 — 45.3% +0.02 2–7 (22%) 5–2 (71%) 97.4 +0.37
29 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32 1998 1619 127.2 -1.06 +0.30 0.963 49.4% -14 +45 — 48.3% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 1–3 (25%) 102.0 -0.26
30 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57 1999 1580 98.3 +1.26 -0.69 0.676 43.7% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.25
31 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94 — 1777 140.3 -2.28 +1.80 0.981 49.6% -61 +72 +2 46.9% -0.17 78–74 (51%) 55–65 (46%) 101.9 -0.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.