H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Tomas Smid H2H: 4-1

Jakob Hlasek holds a 4–1 lead over Tomas Smid in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1986 Toulouse fourth round 7-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 1
5 main draw meetings
Tomas Smid
CZE Age 70 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 10, 1986* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Jakob Hlasek #24 7-6 6-3 Tomas Smid #53 Match data
Sep 18, 1986* Hamburg ATP 250 R32 Clay Jakob Hlasek #28 6-2 6-3 Tomas Smid #46 Match data
Nov 23, 1985* Hong Kong ATP 250 QF Hard Jakob Hlasek #40 6-2 6-4 Tomas Smid #17 Match data
Mar 23, 1985* Rotterdam ATP 250 SF Carpet Jakob Hlasek #86 6-3 6-7 6-3 Tomas Smid #17 Match data
Nov 10, 1982* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Tomas Smid #25 6-2 6-7 6-4 Jakob Hlasek Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 389 300 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Tomas Smid #975 #11 28 1,998 497 318 61.0% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Tomas Smid
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,784 0 0 1976 5–7 41.7% #154 1,542 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1977 16–18 47.1% #67 1,637 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,856 0 0 1978 36–25 59.0% #36 1,799 0 1
23 1988 44–14 75.9% #8 2,050 0 2 1979 50–25 66.7% #27 1,870 0 2
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1980 45–21 68.2% #23 1,950 0 4
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,937 0 4 1981 54–28 65.9% #28 1,864 0 5
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,869 0 5 1982 62–28 68.9% #24 1,901 0 7
27 1992 24–22 52.2% #36 1,806 0 5 1983 59–30 66.3% #17 1,902 0 9
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 1984 46–27 63.0% #16 1,840 0 9
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,676 0 5 1985 47–27 63.5% #19 1,804 0 10
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 1986 28–24 53.8% #54 1,721 0 10
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,751 0 5 1987 30–26 53.6% #31 1,729 0 10
32 — — — — — — — 1988 17–23 42.5% #115 1,656 0 10
33 — — — — — — — 1989 2–9 18.2% #453 1,537 0 10