H2H data updated: 2026-09-05 00:00 UTC

Jakob Hlasek vs Tommy Ho H2H: 1-0

Jakob Hlasek holds a 1–0 lead over Tommy Ho in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakob Hlasek won the 1990 US Open round of 64 6-3 6-2 7-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jakob Hlasek
SUI Age 61 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Tommy Ho
USA Age 53 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jakob Hlasek #27 6-3 6-2 7-6 Tommy Ho #276 Match data Aug 31, 1990* R64 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jakob Hlasek #583 #7 1,308 2,062 393 302 56.5% 0 0 0 0 5 5
Tommy Ho #1,306 #85 522 1,622 36 66 35.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jakob Hlasek Tommy Ho
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1988 1–4 20.0% #625 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1989 0–5 0.0% #641 1,444 0 0
17 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,516 0 0 1990 2–2 50.0% #182 1,490 0 0
18 1983 5–6 45.5% #227 1,567 0 0 1991 2–4 33.3% #224 1,491 0 0
19 1984 16–19 45.7% #91 1,647 0 0 1992 4–4 50.0% #154 1,561 0 0
20 1985 29–23 55.8% #33 1,785 0 0 1993 7–14 33.3% #132 1,553 0 0
21 1986 35–25 58.3% #32 1,732 0 0 1994 2–10 16.7% #165 1,484 0 0
22 1987 32–21 60.4% #23 1,864 0 0 1995 14–16 46.7% #127 1,562 0 0
23 1988 46–15 75.4% #8 2,050 0 2 1996 1–2 33.3% #482 1,556 0 0
24 1989 23–18 56.1% #30 1,795 0 3 1997 3–4 42.9% #250 1,560 0 0
25 1990 41–22 65.1% #17 1,938 0 4 1998 0–1 0.0% #1256 1,546 0 0
26 1991 45–25 64.3% #20 1,870 0 5 — — — — — — —
27 1992 26–23 53.1% #36 1,793 0 5 — — — — — — —
28 1993 20–25 44.4% #71 1,713 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1994 22–24 47.8% #70 1,677 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1995 32–27 54.2% #35 1,783 0 5 — — — — — — —
31 1996 20–27 42.6% #74 1,753 0 5 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jakob Hlasek Tommy Ho
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1984 6 5 11 54.5% 2 6 8 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1992 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1985 9 8 17 52.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 1993 3 10 13 23.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
21 1986 6 9 15 40.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 2 1 3 66.7% 9 7 16 56.3% 1994 0 6 6 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
22 1987 13 6 19 68.4% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 1995 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1988 22 7 29 75.9% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 15 3 18 83.3% 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1989 6 6 12 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 1997 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1990 17 7 24 70.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 17 7 24 70.8% 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 1991 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 18 10 28 64.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 10 9 19 52.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 8 10 18 44.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 9 9 18 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 8 19 57.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 10 13 23 43.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 149 115 264 56.4% 75 70 145 51.7% 36 31 67 53.7% 133 86 219 60.7% — 22 45 67 32.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 10 12 22 45.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jakob Hlasek Tommy Ho
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1493 111.5 — — — — +31 — — 16.7% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — -0.44
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1444 98.2 — — — — +20 — — 9.1% -2.27 0–1 — — +0.20
17 1982 1516 114.8 — — — — +52 — — 37.5% -1.00 1–1 1–0 — -0.29 1990 1490 118.0 — — — — +32 — — 33.3% -0.89 1–1 1–2 (33%) — -0.08
18 1983 1567 112.2 — — — — +8 — +34 46.7% -0.03 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 104.2 +0.84 1991 1492 106.7 -0.42 -1.22 0.898 47.8% +20 — — 40.0% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
19 1984 1648 128.9 — — — — +9 -160 +14 43.7% -0.39 5–4 (56%) 5–6 (45%) 100.9 +1.04 1992 1561 120.9 +0.64 +0.42 1.096 51.0% +23 — — 59.1% +0.41 0–2 4–3 (57%) — +0.42
20 1985 1785 145.6 — — — — +2 -156 -119 54.0% +0.12 7–5 (58%) 10–7 (59%) 106.4 -1.17 1993 1553 117.7 -1.61 -2.42 0.843 46.9% +25 — — 40.7% -0.78 1–6 (14%) 4–4 (50%) 95.5 +0.53
21 1986 1733 142.9 — — — — -50 +67 -41 55.9% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 16–10 (62%) 103.8 +0.10 1994 1484 112.9 -1.58 -0.49 0.877 47.5% +17 — — 25.0% -1.14 1–2 (33%) 2–6 (25%) 96.7 +0.63
22 1987 1865 151.8 — — — — +13 -128 -111 58.0% +0.44 7–5 (58%) 8–6 (57%) 103.3 -2.72 1995 1562 130.5 +0.48 +1.09 1.031 50.3% +18 — +36 49.4% +0.06 3–6 (33%) 3–5 (38%) 95.0 +0.89
23 1988 2050 159.4 — — — — +34 -279 — 64.7% +0.98 18–5 (78%) 15–15 (50%) 106.7 -1.83 1996 1557 112.9 -0.28 +0.97 0.978 49.8% +16 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.13
24 1989 1795 146.3 — — — — +95 -38 — 55.5% +0.60 8–10 (44%) 8–14 (36%) 88.6 -0.85 1997 1561 115.7 +1.65 -1.05 1.015 50.2% +16 — — 47.4% -0.32 1–2 (33%) 2–0 — +0.34
25 1990 1938 151.4 — — — — +52 -214 -223 59.5% +0.50 12–7 (63%) 15–11 (58%) 106.9 -0.05 1998 1546 96.1 -1.39 -2.17 0.509 39.4% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.11
26 1991 1871 151.6 +3.96 -0.75 1.078 51.3% +40 -73 -130 59.6% +0.57 15–8 (65%) 20–19 (51%) 99.9 -0.58 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1992 1793 147.3 +1.45 +1.86 1.055 50.6% +38 -51 -34 51.2% +0.10 9–5 (64%) 5–14 (26%) 95.1 -1.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1993 1714 144.6 +1.45 -0.65 0.976 49.5% +42 -38 +41 44.5% -0.09 10–7 (59%) 10–14 (42%) 100.6 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1994 1677 138.4 +1.07 -1.27 0.973 49.5% +6 -6 +136 45.4% -0.19 6–2 (75%) 11–10 (52%) 106.3 -1.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1995 1783 142.6 +1.21 +0.39 1.019 50.3% -17 -53 — 53.3% +0.30 11–11 (50%) 18–13 (58%) 101.8 -1.57 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1996 1753 139.5 +1.73 -2.17 0.951 48.9% -38 -49 +20 47.5% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 13–12 (52%) 95.2 -1.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2062 152.1 +1.95 -0.42 1.014 50.1% +20 -84 -20 54.0% +0.28 125–90 (58%) 159–152 (51%) 103.8 -1.94 — 1622 127.2 -0.32 -0.37 0.946 48.8% +21 — +36 40.7% -0.54 9–23 (28%) 18–24 (43%) 91.9 +2.58

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.