H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jakob Hlasek vs Wojtek Fibak H2H: 2-1
Jakob Hlasek holds a 2–1 lead over Wojtek Fibak in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jakob Hlasek leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Wojtek Fibak won the 1984 Vienna fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 26, 1984* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Wojtek Fibak | 6-1 6-3 | Jakob Hlasek | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1984* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Jakob Hlasek | 7-5 4-6 6-2 6-1 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
| Mar 22, 1984* | Milan | ATP 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jakob Hlasek | 0-6 7-5 6-3 | Wojtek Fibak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakob Hlasek | #583 | #7 | 1,308 | 2,062 | 389 | 300 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Wojtek Fibak | #566 | #10 | 0 | 2,089 | 520 | 309 | 62.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Jakob Hlasek | Wojtek Fibak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1982 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #102 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #227 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 39–33 | 54.2% | #58 | 1,746 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 74–31 | 70.5% | #14 | 2,070 | 0 | 3 |
| 1985 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #33 | 1,784 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 60–30 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,989 | 0 | 4 |
| 1986 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #32 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 60–32 | 65.2% | #21 | 1,895 | 0 | 5 |
| 1987 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #23 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 59–22 | 72.8% | #15 | 1,976 | 0 | 7 |
| 1988 | 44–14 | 75.9% | #8 | 2,050 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 58–25 | 69.9% | #14 | 1,941 | 0 | 10 |
| 1989 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #30 | 1,795 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 42–20 | 67.7% | #17 | 1,846 | 0 | 11 |
| 1990 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #17 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 52–26 | 66.7% | #23 | 1,988 | 0 | 14 |
| 1991 | 45–25 | 64.3% | #20 | 1,869 | 0 | 5 | 1983 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #40 | 1,779 | 0 | 14 |
| 1992 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #36 | 1,806 | 0 | 5 | 1984 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #45 | 1,727 | 0 | 14 |
| 1993 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #71 | 1,713 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #62 | 1,721 | 0 | 14 |
| 1994 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #70 | 1,676 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #125 | 1,636 | 0 | 14 |
| 1995 | 32–27 | 54.2% | #35 | 1,783 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #742 | 1,572 | 0 | 14 |
| 1996 | 20–27 | 42.6% | #74 | 1,751 | 0 | 5 | 1988 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #570 | 1,573 | 0 | 14 |