H2H data updated: 2026-10-08 00:00 UTC
Jakub Mensik holds a 1–0 lead over Botic van de Zandschulp in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jakub Mensik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jakub Mensik won the 2026 Canadian Open fourth round 6-4 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakub Mensik | 6-4 7-5 | Botic van de Zandschulp | Match data | Aug 9, 2026 | R16 | Canadian Open | Masters 1000 | Hard |
Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakub Mensik | #15 | #12 | 2,650 | 1,988 | 88 | 52 | 62.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Botic van de Zandschulp | #41 | #22 | 1,573 | 1,933 | 124 | 125 | 49.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakub Mensik | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2023 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #167 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2024 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,851 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2025 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2026 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,896 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #57 | 1,854 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 34–28 | 54.8% | #35 | 1,836 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #50 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #80 | 1,778 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #41 | 1,819 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jakub Mensik | Botic van de Zandschulp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1492 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2023 | 1609 | 116.4 | -0.14 | +0.70 | 0.797 | 45.3% | +36 | — | — | 54.5% | -0.45 | — | 2–0 | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2024 | 1851 | 147.6 | -1.17 | +0.85 | 0.958 | 49.6% | +14 | -207 | -265 | 57.8% | +0.20 | 11–7 (61%) | 15–8 (65%) | 111.0 | -0.74 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2025 | 1836 | 148.9 | +1.97 | +0.24 | 1.061 | 51.2% | +48 | -135 | -183 | 61.5% | +0.63 | 7–11 (39%) | 19–13 (59%) | 100.4 | +1.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2026 | 1897 | 153.0 | +1.93 | +1.73 | 1.112 | 51.6% | +18 | +1 | -253 | 63.0% | +0.57 | 12–9 (57%) | 18–9 (67%) | 106.1 | +1.83 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1516 | 105.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1492 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1480 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1855 | 136.1 | +1.69 | +0.20 | 1.015 | 50.0% | -21 | — | — | 53.2% | +0.18 | 6–3 (67%) | 8–5 (62%) | 108.1 | -0.41 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1836 | 154.1 | +0.18 | +2.55 | 1.051 | 50.8% | -34 | -42 | -60 | 52.7% | +0.19 | 9–8 (53%) | 16–9 (64%) | 107.5 | -1.63 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1793 | 143.4 | -2.02 | +2.12 | 0.976 | 49.5% | +31 | -62 | -91 | 44.6% | -0.30 | 10–7 (59%) | 9–8 (53%) | 103.7 | +0.41 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1779 | 143.2 | -3.37 | +1.62 | 0.904 | 48.2% | +15 | -55 | -84 | 38.8% | -0.74 | 3–4 (43%) | 6–10 (38%) | 95.0 | -2.47 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 1715 | 142.0 | -0.75 | +1.66 | 1.018 | 50.0% | +27 | -14 | — | 45.7% | -0.22 | 6–8 (43%) | 7–11 (39%) | 96.4 | -1.80 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 1820 | 146.9 | -1.12 | +2.47 | 1.034 | 50.8% | +34 | -114 | -179 | 54.8% | +0.24 | 6–9 (40%) | 20–11 (65%) | 103.2 | +0.12 |
| Career | — | 1988 | 151.4 | +1.05 | +0.94 | 1.041 | 50.8% | +28 | -107 | -227 | 60.9% | +0.46 | 30–27 (53%) | 54–30 (64%) | 111.3 | +2.08 | — | 1933 | 148.8 | -0.95 | +1.96 | 1.003 | 50.0% | +8 | -58 | -96 | 48.9% | -0.07 | 40–39 (51%) | 66–54 (55%) | 106.4 | -2.32 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexander Bublik | 3 | 1 | 4 | Oct 1, 2026 | H2H |
| Ben Shelton | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 11, 2026 | H2H |
| Alex de Minaur | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexei Popyrin | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casper Ruud | 3 | 3 | 6 | Apr 5, 2024 | H2H |
| Daniil Medvedev | 1 | 4 | 5 | Aug 5, 2026 | H2H |
| Ugo Humbert | 0 | 5 | 5 | Feb 3, 2026 | H2H |
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 4 | 5 | Jul 3, 2025 | H2H |
| Adrian Mannarino | 4 | 1 | 5 | Feb 28, 2024 | H2H |