H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Jakub Mensik vs Federico Gaio.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakub Mensik | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Federico Gaio | Match data | Jan 15, 2024 | Q2 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakub Mensik | #18 | #12 | 2,650 | 1,988 | 87 | 51 | 63.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Federico Gaio | #1,461 | #124 | 548 | 1,568 | 3 | 15 | 16.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakub Mensik | Federico Gaio | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2023 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #167 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2024 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #48 | 1,851 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2025 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,836 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2026 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #254 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #137 | 1,428 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #153 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #425 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Jakub Mensik | Federico Gaio | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 2022 | 1492 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2023 | 1609 | 116.4 | -0.14 | +0.70 | 0.797 | 45.3% | +36 | — | — | 54.5% | -0.45 | — | 2–0 | — | +0.23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2024 | 1851 | 147.6 | -1.17 | +0.85 | 0.958 | 49.6% | +14 | -207 | -265 | 57.8% | +0.20 | 11–7 (61%) | 15–8 (65%) | 111.0 | -0.74 | 2010 | 1495 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2025 | 1836 | 148.9 | +1.97 | +0.24 | 1.061 | 51.2% | +48 | -135 | -183 | 61.5% | +0.63 | 7–11 (39%) | 19–13 (59%) | 100.4 | +1.53 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2026 | 1899 | 152.3 | +1.97 | +1.79 | 1.116 | 51.7% | +20 | -5 | -255 | 63.4% | +0.61 | 12–9 (57%) | 17–9 (65%) | 105.5 | +1.94 | 2012 | 1482 | 99.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1505 | 112.7 | -0.95 | +1.71 | 0.637 | 42.6% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.01 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1472 | 100.3 | -0.98 | -2.76 | 0.735 | 43.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.00 | — | — | — | -0.04 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 1478 | 103.6 | -1.30 | -0.39 | 0.899 | 48.1% | — | +54 | — | 40.0% | -0.60 | 2–0 | 1–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 1550 | 114.7 | +0.83 | -1.03 | 0.792 | 47.1% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.20 | — | 0–2 | — | -0.01 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1488 | 103.6 | -1.90 | -4.23 | 0.859 | 46.7% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.33 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.04 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1429 | 102.4 | +0.59 | -1.53 | 0.979 | 49.5% | — | — | — | 22.2% | -1.00 | 0–1 | 0–2 | — | +0.26 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 1515 | 114.2 | -0.31 | -1.59 | 0.819 | 46.7% | — | -47 | — | 20.0% | -1.80 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.31 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1478 | 99.3 | -0.15 | -1.03 | 0.806 | 45.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.03 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 1475 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 1466 | 97.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1988 | 151.2 | +1.05 | +0.94 | 1.041 | 50.8% | +29 | -109 | -227 | 61.0% | +0.48 | 30–27 (53%) | 53–30 (64%) | 110.9 | +2.19 | — | 1569 | 109.1 | -0.41 | -1.25 | 0.842 | 47.0% | — | +4 | — | 20.9% | -1.44 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–7 (13%) | 95.6 | +1.94 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 1 | 5 | 6 | Mar 8, 2026 | H2H |
| Ben Shelton | 2 | 2 | 4 | Aug 11, 2026 | H2H |
| Alex de Minaur | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 29, 2026 | H2H |
| Alexei Popyrin | 3 | 1 | 4 | May 9, 2026 | H2H |
| Grigor Dimitrov | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 2, 2026 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ricardas Berankis | 0 | 2 | 2 | Mar 26, 2021 | H2H |
| Radu Albot | 0 | 1 | 1 | Feb 3, 2022 | H2H |
| Diego Schwartzman | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 30, 2021 | H2H |
| Andrey Rublev | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 22, 2021 | H2H |
| Benoit Paire | 1 | 0 | 1 | Apr 21, 2021 | H2H |