H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 10:32 UTC
Jakub Mensik vs Roberto Bautista Agut H2H: 1-1
Jakub Mensik and Roberto Bautista Agut are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roberto Bautista Agut leads 1–0 on grass, while Jakub Mensik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberto Bautista Agut won the 2025 HSBC Championships fourth round 3-6 6-3 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Czechia
Age 20
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Spain
Age 38
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 2025* | HSBC Championships | ATP 500 | R16 | Grass | Roberto Bautista Agut | 3-6 6-3 7-5 | Jakub Mensik | Match data |
| Mar 21, 2025* | Miami Open Presented by Itau | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jakub Mensik | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Roberto Bautista Agut | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jakub Mensik | #19 | #12 | 2,650 | 1,986 | 78 | 46 | 62.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Roberto Bautista Agut | #180 | #9 | 3,215 | 2,106 | 411 | 294 | 58.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jakub Mensik | Roberto Bautista Agut | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2023 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #167 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2024 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #48 | 1,847 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2025 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,834 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2026 | 23–11 | 67.6% | #19 | 1,916 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #281 | 1,553 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #170 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #58 | 1,800 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 44–21 | 67.7% | #15 | 2,005 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 41–29 | 58.6% | #25 | 1,997 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #14 | 1,991 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #20 | 1,999 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 33–18 | 64.7% | #24 | 1,932 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #9 | 1,940 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,960 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #19 | 1,849 | 0 | 9 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #21 | 1,870 | 0 | 11 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #57 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 23–21 | 52.3% | #51 | 1,812 | 0 | 12 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #90 | 1,771 | 0 | 12 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #180 | 1,631 | 0 | 12 |