H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

James Blake vs Andreas Seppi H2H: 2-2

James Blake and Andreas Seppi are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while James Blake leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Andreas Seppi won the 2009 Wimbledon first round 7-5 6-4 7-6(5).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main draw meetings
Andreas Seppi
ITA Age 42 Right-Handed 191 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Andreas Seppi #50 7-5 6-4 7-6(5) James Blake #17 Match data Jun 24, 2009* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
James Blake #8 7-6(5) 3-6 6-1 Andreas Seppi #46 Match data May 8, 2008* R32 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
James Blake #9 7-5 6-3 Andreas Seppi #46 Match data Mar 30, 2008* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Andreas Seppi #68 3-6 6-3 6-4 James Blake #23 Match data Jan 6, 2006* R16 Adelaide International ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,041 349 237 59.6% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Andreas Seppi #1,188 #18 1,895 1,979 367 401 47.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age James Blake Andreas Seppi
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #240 1,464 0 0
20 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,453 0 0 2004 5–9 35.7% #146 1,593 0 0
21 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0 2005 17–16 51.5% #68 1,685 0 0
22 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1 2006 19–28 40.4% #74 1,553 0 0
23 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,794 0 1 2007 20–23 46.5% #50 1,732 0 0
24 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1 2008 28–28 50.0% #35 1,750 0 0
25 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3 2009 23–28 45.1% #49 1,756 0 0
26 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 1,999 0 8 2010 24–28 46.2% #52 1,720 0 0
27 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,916 0 10 2011 25–24 51.0% #38 1,807 0 1
28 2008 44–22 66.7% #10 1,883 0 10 2012 36–25 59.0% #23 1,921 0 3
29 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,849 0 10 2013 28–27 50.9% #25 1,833 0 3
30 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10 2014 23–28 45.1% #45 1,770 0 3
31 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,824 0 10 2015 26–24 52.0% #29 1,861 0 3
32 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,781 0 10 2016 19–24 44.2% #87 1,794 0 3
33 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,711 0 10 2017 17–17 50.0% #86 1,742 0 3
34 — — — — — — — 2018 24–21 53.3% #37 1,782 0 3
35 — — — — — — — 2019 17–24 41.5% #72 1,751 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2020 7–7 50.0% #106 1,654 0 3
37 — — — — — — — 2021 7–13 35.0% #102 1,653 0 3
38 — — — — — — — 2022 2–5 28.6% #354 1,619 0 3

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age James Blake Andreas Seppi
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2001 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2005 3 5 8 37.5% 13 7 20 65.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2002 21 12 33 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2006 6 11 17 35.3% 6 11 17 35.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2003 24 14 38 63.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2008 13 17 30 43.3% 9 7 16 56.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 2005 28 13 41 68.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2009 10 16 26 38.5% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2006 46 14 60 76.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 9 15 24 37.5% 14 10 24 58.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2007 40 15 55 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 10 14 24 41.7% 8 8 16 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — —
28 2008 33 15 48 68.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 18 16 34 52.9% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
29 2009 13 11 24 54.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2013 16 16 32 50.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
30 2010 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2014 13 16 29 44.8% 10 10 20 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
31 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 3 5 8 37.5% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
32 2012 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 10 16 26 38.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — —
33 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2017 9 8 17 52.9% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 14 10 24 58.3% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 14 13 27 51.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 273 164 437 62.5% 39 39 78 50.0% 32 27 59 54.2% 5 7 12 41.7% — 182 219 401 45.4% 120 123 243 49.4% 61 49 110 55.5% 4 10 14 28.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 563/586 of James Blake's and 759/768 of Andreas Seppi's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age James Blake Andreas Seppi
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1998 1/1 8.0 7.0 49.1% 60.4% 47.3% 66.7% 15.4% 53.7% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 5/5 3.6 4.4 54.3% 64.1% 45.3% 41.7% 36.7% 55.8% 31.8% 2003 2/2 2.5 2.0 58.0% 60.3% 53.3% 50.0% 28.2% 57.3% 37.3%
20 2000 4/4 3.3 3.0 48.4% 58.5% 30.3% 35.4% 54.5% 44.2% 38.6% 2004 14/14 3.2 3.8 56.9% 69.3% 45.0% 54.9% 38.8% 59.0% 37.1%
21 2001 17/20 5.7 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 54.9% 64.8% 42.6% 64.8% 37.2% 2005 33/33 4.3 3.1 56.9% 69.9% 49.9% 63.8% 43.9% 61.1% 37.2%
22 2002 50/56 4.5 2.5 58.7% 71.0% 51.7% 62.3% 44.2% 63.1% 39.2% 2006 46/47 3.7 3.7 55.5% 66.5% 48.7% 55.9% 40.6% 58.5% 36.9%
23 2003 52/53 5.2 3.0 60.2% 71.5% 51.7% 56.1% 48.8% 63.6% 40.7% 2007 43/43 4.7 3.4 57.8% 69.5% 50.9% 58.5% 44.2% 61.7% 38.2%
24 2004 28/28 4.8 2.4 60.2% 70.7% 51.0% 51.0% 36.6% 63.0% 39.1% 2008 54/56 4.6 3.3 58.3% 70.3% 49.8% 57.5% 42.7% 61.7% 38.8%
25 2005 54/54 6.6 2.4 58.6% 74.9% 53.7% 62.7% 41.6% 66.2% 39.7% 2009 51/51 4.0 2.6 60.1% 68.7% 49.4% 53.6% 37.9% 60.9% 38.6%
26 2006 77/78 6.1 2.7 57.5% 73.3% 53.3% 61.1% 44.9% 64.8% 41.9% 2010 52/52 4.2 2.2 61.3% 68.3% 52.8% 56.2% 41.5% 62.3% 38.8%
27 2007 67/70 7.4 2.9 57.8% 76.8% 54.8% 62.3% 47.5% 67.4% 39.1% 2011 49/49 5.0 2.4 58.1% 69.6% 50.5% 56.1% 44.8% 61.5% 36.8%
28 2008 59/66 7.0 2.6 55.7% 75.0% 52.5% 54.6% 46.8% 65.0% 39.6% 2012 59/61 4.4 1.8 61.4% 71.1% 51.3% 53.9% 48.4% 63.6% 38.8%
29 2009 41/41 6.3 3.0 57.3% 74.0% 53.5% 60.6% 41.0% 65.3% 35.1% 2013 55/55 5.2 3.1 59.3% 70.8% 49.4% 52.1% 37.8% 62.1% 38.5%
30 2010 32/32 5.2 2.8 57.4% 72.1% 52.4% 53.6% 37.7% 63.7% 36.3% 2014 50/51 5.1 2.9 57.4% 69.1% 50.9% 60.4% 37.7% 61.3% 36.3%
31 2011 33/35 5.5 3.8 57.7% 74.1% 47.4% 61.0% 46.0% 62.8% 35.5% 2015 49/50 5.4 2.2 56.1% 72.9% 50.2% 60.7% 41.8% 63.0% 38.2%
32 2012 20/20 5.4 3.1 56.9% 71.3% 49.4% 51.8% 46.5% 62.0% 36.7% 2016 41/43 4.9 2.7 56.6% 71.9% 51.3% 52.2% 42.4% 63.0% 35.6%
33 2013 23/23 6.0 2.7 53.4% 75.6% 48.6% 58.9% 49.1% 62.6% 37.7% 2017 34/34 7.7 2.6 56.8% 72.9% 50.0% 59.3% 43.3% 63.2% 36.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 45/45 5.8 2.7 58.6% 73.6% 49.1% 60.0% 45.4% 63.5% 37.3%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 41/41 6.4 3.1 57.8% 70.4% 48.9% 53.1% 42.9% 61.4% 35.1%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 14/14 4.8 2.0 62.0% 68.5% 50.8% 55.0% 43.9% 61.9% 36.3%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 20/20 6.6 2.8 56.1% 68.5% 49.9% 56.5% 46.7% 60.4% 36.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 7/7 5.0 2.1 57.7% 68.1% 46.4% 57.2% 41.3% 59.5% 32.7%
Career — 563/586 6.0 2.8 57.7% 73.3% 52.1% 58.7% 44.5% 64.3% 38.8% — 759/768 5.0 2.8 58.3% 70.2% 50.1% 56.6% 42.3% 61.8% 37.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age James Blake Andreas Seppi
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1998 1492 98.2 +0.92 -1.01 0.743 44.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 1480 105.6 -2.20 -0.63 0.718 44.0% +30 — — 16.7% -2.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.11 2003 1464 98.8 -1.82 -2.29 0.875 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.20 0–1 — — +0.12
20 2000 1453 104.3 -4.21 +0.21 0.692 41.4% +17 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — -0.23 2004 1593 115.2 -0.75 +0.43 0.906 48.1% -16 -39 — 37.8% -0.84 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.78
21 2001 1647 135.3 +2.25 +0.39 1.059 51.0% -18 — -87 55.1% +0.55 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.08 2005 1685 130.1 -0.99 -0.10 0.955 49.2% -130 +52 — 49.4% -0.22 6–4 (60%) 8–6 (57%) — -1.12
22 2002 1816 147.9 +1.40 +2.12 1.061 51.1% -26 -178 -199 56.1% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.19 2006 1554 122.1 -2.81 -0.76 0.888 47.8% -35 +47 +127 40.7% -0.58 9–7 (56%) 7–12 (37%) — +0.63
23 2003 1794 146.7 +1.54 +3.57 1.120 52.2% +27 -165 -202 58.3% +0.52 6–12 (33%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.97 2007 1733 129.5 -1.54 +1.61 0.996 50.0% -57 +1 -108 44.3% -0.13 8–4 (67%) 9–13 (41%) — +0.24
24 2004 1692 126.8 -0.56 +1.37 1.056 50.9% +63 -67 — 55.1% +0.38 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.11 2008 1751 145.6 -0.69 +2.66 1.011 50.3% -26 -6 -45 48.0% +0.10 15–10 (60%) 5–17 (23%) — -1.47
25 2005 1925 148.8 +3.11 +2.61 1.175 52.6% +27 -259 -338 61.2% +0.81 8–9 (47%) 10–15 (40%) — -1.49 2009 1757 150.2 -0.94 +2.35 0.989 49.6% -46 +23 -10 43.7% -0.36 10–7 (59%) 9–15 (38%) — -2.26
26 2006 2000 158.3 +2.59 +5.15 1.189 53.1% +48 -316 -257 64.5% +0.91 17–8 (68%) 18–14 (56%) — +0.23 2010 1720 141.7 -0.45 +1.85 1.030 50.2% -70 +114 -46 47.6% -0.14 6–9 (40%) 9–10 (47%) — -0.33
27 2007 1917 151.1 +3.35 +2.66 1.201 53.1% +45 -237 -153 66.3% +1.01 12–9 (57%) 20–16 (56%) — +3.66 2011 1808 145.9 -0.91 -0.36 0.957 49.4% -71 -3 +26 48.3% +0.02 13–7 (65%) 6–12 (33%) — -0.68
28 2008 1883 152.4 +2.01 +2.91 1.131 52.4% +72 -189 -110 61.9% +0.79 13–11 (54%) 12–11 (52%) — +4.15 2012 1921 156.8 +0.87 +2.33 1.065 50.9% -79 +76 -102 55.3% +0.21 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) — -0.77
29 2009 1850 151.0 +2.02 +0.45 1.012 50.5% +25 -106 -16 53.8% +0.24 7–8 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.82 2013 1834 154.3 -0.73 +1.80 1.015 50.0% -18 +59 +107 48.0% -0.11 12–12 (50%) 9–10 (47%) — +0.56
30 2010 1760 142.1 -0.13 0.00 1.000 50.0% +24 — — 49.4% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.97 2014 1771 155.3 -0.89 +0.23 0.940 48.9% -14 +128 — 47.3% -0.12 9–11 (45%) 10–12 (45%) — -1.46
31 2011 1825 150.5 -0.14 -0.22 0.954 49.7% +33 — — 50.0% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.57 2015 1862 160.3 -0.29 +3.23 1.032 50.3% -22 -18 +98 48.8% +0.03 9–6 (60%) 8–11 (42%) — -1.84
32 2012 1781 139.4 -0.94 -0.30 0.965 49.4% +57 — — 45.5% -0.34 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.24 2016 1795 150.0 -0.29 -0.63 0.962 49.4% -16 +5 +142 43.0% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 7–7 (50%) — -0.56
33 2013 1712 137.4 -1.34 +1.25 1.009 50.5% +56 — -13 42.1% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.69 2017 1743 138.5 -0.29 -0.23 0.995 49.8% +20 -11 +131 46.1% -0.20 5–3 (63%) 9–13 (41%) — -0.16
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1782 144.8 -0.59 +1.09 1.021 50.4% +23 -24 +48 53.8% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.79
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1751 145.2 -1.93 -0.58 0.911 48.4% +46 -95 +48 44.6% -0.55 8–9 (47%) 13–6 (68%) — -1.18
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1654 129.8 -0.98 -0.81 0.953 49.2% +101 — — 48.8% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.62
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1653 123.3 -2.23 -0.39 0.917 48.5% +16 -68 +137 40.0% -0.55 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) — +1.02
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1619 114.5 -1.92 -2.82 0.807 47.3% -12 — — 33.3% -1.06 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.06
Career — 2042 153.8 +1.56 +2.23 1.088 51.6% +35 -188 -160 57.2% +0.48 97–99 (49%) 127–119 (52%) 97.2 +1.00 — 1980 149.1 -0.85 +0.97 0.981 49.6% -25 +34 +49 46.9% -0.17 146–125 (54%) 149–176 (46%) 100.2 -1.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.