H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

James Blake vs Carlos Berlocq H2H: 2-1

James Blake holds a 2–1 lead over Carlos Berlocq in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while James Blake leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Carlos Berlocq won the 2012 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship first round 6-4 2-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Carlos Berlocq
ARG Age 43 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Carlos Berlocq #37 6-4 2-6 6-1 James Blake #74 Match data Apr 12, 2012* R32 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP 250 Clay
James Blake #163 6-7(3) 6-3 6-4 Carlos Berlocq #72 Match data Apr 7, 2011* R32 U.S. Men's Clay Court Championship ATP 250 Clay
James Blake #9 6-0 6-0 Carlos Berlocq #81 Match data Mar 22, 2006* R64 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,041 349 237 59.6% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Carlos Berlocq #505 #37 1,086 1,853 127 187 40.4% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age James Blake Carlos Berlocq
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,453 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1 2005 0–1 0.0% #79 1,454 0 0
23 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,794 0 1 2006 5–17 22.7% #132 1,428 0 0
24 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1 2007 11–15 42.3% #85 1,551 0 0
25 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3 2008 3–16 15.8% #157 1,450 0 0
26 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 1,999 0 8 — — — — — — —
27 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,916 0 10 2010 3–3 50.0% #66 1,542 0 0
28 2008 44–22 66.7% #10 1,883 0 10 2011 15–23 39.5% #60 1,657 0 0
29 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,849 0 10 2012 23–29 44.2% #66 1,656 0 0
30 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10 2013 26–24 52.0% #41 1,827 0 1
31 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,824 0 10 2014 17–17 50.0% #72 1,743 0 2
32 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,781 0 10 2015 7–9 43.8% #111 1,693 0 2
33 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,711 0 10 2016 4–6 40.0% #95 1,734 0 2
34 — — — — — — — 2017 12–19 38.7% #112 1,694 0 2
35 — — — — — — — 2018 1–5 16.7% #139 1,667 0 2
36 — — — — — — — 2019 0–3 0.0% #507 1,505 0 2

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age James Blake Carlos Berlocq
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 21 12 33 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2005 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 2003 24 14 38 63.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2006 1 3 4 25.0% 4 13 17 23.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2004 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2007 0 4 4 0.0% 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2005 28 13 41 68.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2008 0 4 4 0.0% 3 11 14 21.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2006 46 14 60 76.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 40 15 55 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2008 33 15 48 68.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2011 4 7 11 36.4% 10 14 24 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 2009 13 11 24 54.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2012 7 14 21 33.3% 15 11 26 57.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
30 2010 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2013 10 9 19 52.6% 15 12 27 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
31 2011 18 14 32 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2014 1 7 8 12.5% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
32 2012 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 1 3 4 25.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2013 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2016 0 1 1 0.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 8 13 21 38.1% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 273 164 437 62.5% 39 39 78 50.0% 32 27 59 54.2% 5 7 12 41.7% — 27 57 84 32.1% 94 112 206 45.6% 6 18 24 25.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 563/586 of James Blake's and 307/314 of Carlos Berlocq's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age James Blake Carlos Berlocq
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 1998 1/1 8.0 7.0 49.1% 60.4% 47.3% 66.7% 15.4% 53.7% 34.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 5/5 3.6 4.4 54.3% 64.1% 45.3% 41.7% 36.7% 55.8% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 4/4 3.3 3.0 48.4% 58.5% 30.3% 35.4% 54.5% 44.2% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 17/20 5.7 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 54.9% 64.8% 42.6% 64.8% 37.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 50/56 4.5 2.5 58.7% 71.0% 51.7% 62.3% 44.2% 63.1% 39.2% 2005 1/1 1.0 4.0 59.5% 68.0% 29.4% 33.3% 0.0% 52.4% 30.8%
23 2003 52/53 5.2 3.0 60.2% 71.5% 51.7% 56.1% 48.8% 63.6% 40.7% 2006 22/22 2.2 3.0 59.9% 60.1% 45.1% 54.3% 54.5% 53.6% 38.5%
24 2004 28/28 4.8 2.4 60.2% 70.7% 51.0% 51.0% 36.6% 63.0% 39.1% 2007 23/26 3.7 1.7 61.9% 66.6% 50.1% 54.9% 40.9% 59.6% 34.5%
25 2005 54/54 6.6 2.4 58.6% 74.9% 53.7% 62.7% 41.6% 66.2% 39.7% 2008 19/19 3.3 2.3 61.7% 63.4% 43.1% 46.0% 40.2% 56.0% 37.5%
26 2006 77/78 6.1 2.7 57.5% 73.3% 53.3% 61.1% 44.9% 64.8% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 67/70 7.4 2.9 57.8% 76.8% 54.8% 62.3% 47.5% 67.4% 39.1% 2010 6/6 1.7 2.3 60.2% 63.2% 48.1% 56.2% 38.7% 57.2% 36.3%
28 2008 59/66 7.0 2.6 55.7% 75.0% 52.5% 54.6% 46.8% 65.0% 39.6% 2011 37/38 4.0 2.9 61.8% 67.3% 48.4% 51.3% 38.1% 59.9% 39.6%
29 2009 41/41 6.3 3.0 57.3% 74.0% 53.5% 60.6% 41.0% 65.3% 35.1% 2012 51/52 3.0 2.6 65.9% 65.3% 50.3% 53.2% 39.2% 59.9% 40.1%
30 2010 32/32 5.2 2.8 57.4% 72.1% 52.4% 53.6% 37.7% 63.7% 36.3% 2013 49/50 3.3 2.3 67.8% 70.4% 50.0% 55.5% 41.8% 63.7% 37.3%
31 2011 33/35 5.5 3.8 57.7% 74.1% 47.4% 61.0% 46.0% 62.8% 35.5% 2014 33/34 3.0 2.4 67.4% 66.7% 49.6% 60.6% 43.9% 61.1% 39.8%
32 2012 20/20 5.4 3.1 56.9% 71.3% 49.4% 51.8% 46.5% 62.0% 36.7% 2015 16/16 4.3 2.1 64.4% 68.4% 48.0% 56.4% 38.8% 61.0% 37.9%
33 2013 23/23 6.0 2.7 53.4% 75.6% 48.6% 58.9% 49.1% 62.6% 37.7% 2016 10/10 2.0 2.3 71.8% 60.9% 43.6% 56.0% 58.7% 56.5% 40.5%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 31/31 2.9 2.9 61.3% 65.2% 49.6% 55.6% 46.2% 59.0% 37.2%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 6/6 3.0 2.0 65.0% 64.3% 46.9% 47.6% 33.3% 58.5% 28.6%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 3/3 2.3 1.7 56.6% 53.3% 46.2% 36.5% 30.5% 50.1% 37.8%
Career — 563/586 6.0 2.8 57.7% 73.3% 52.1% 58.7% 44.5% 64.3% 38.8% — 307/314 3.2 2.5 64.3% 65.9% 48.5% 54.1% 42.3% 59.6% 38.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age James Blake Carlos Berlocq
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1998 1492 98.2 +0.92 -1.01 0.743 44.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1999 1480 105.6 -2.20 -0.63 0.718 44.0% +30 — — 16.7% -2.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2000 1453 104.3 -4.21 +0.21 0.692 41.4% +17 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — -0.23 2003 1478 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2001 1647 135.3 +2.25 +0.39 1.059 51.0% -18 — -87 55.1% +0.55 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 101.7 +0.08 2004 1465 97.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2002 1816 147.9 +1.40 +2.12 1.061 51.1% -26 -178 -199 56.1% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 9–7 (56%) 104.0 -0.19 2005 1454 100.8 -2.29 -5.10 0.646 40.4% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.19
23 2003 1794 146.7 +1.54 +3.57 1.120 52.2% +27 -165 -202 58.3% +0.52 6–12 (33%) 15–9 (63%) 98.1 -0.97 2006 1428 113.9 -5.99 +0.03 0.831 46.6% +61 +41 — 30.6% -1.06 1–4 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 97.6 +0.77
24 2004 1692 126.8 -0.56 +1.37 1.056 50.9% +63 -67 — 55.1% +0.38 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) 101.0 +2.11 2007 1551 123.3 -2.82 -1.97 0.854 47.4% -83 +68 -87 44.3% -0.26 2–3 (40%) 5–7 (42%) 99.9 +1.33
25 2005 1925 148.8 +3.11 +2.61 1.175 52.6% +27 -259 -338 61.2% +0.81 8–9 (47%) 10–15 (40%) 98.1 -1.49 2008 1451 116.8 -4.78 -0.93 0.851 46.7% -26 +71 — 26.1% -1.33 1–6 (14%) 3–5 (38%) 93.2 -0.25
26 2006 2000 158.3 +2.59 +5.15 1.189 53.1% +48 -316 -257 64.5% +0.91 17–8 (68%) 18–14 (56%) 104.4 +0.23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2007 1917 151.1 +3.35 +2.66 1.201 53.1% +45 -237 -153 66.3% +1.01 12–9 (57%) 20–16 (56%) 97.1 +3.66 2010 1542 116.3 -1.42 -0.42 0.848 46.7% — +85 — 42.9% -0.93 1–0 2–0 — +0.01
28 2008 1883 152.4 +2.01 +2.91 1.131 52.4% +72 -189 -110 61.9% +0.79 13–11 (54%) 12–11 (52%) 97.3 +4.15 2011 1658 141.7 -1.96 +1.98 0.989 49.4% -156 +1 -200 41.5% -0.36 5–10 (33%) 5–10 (33%) 97.6 -1.59
29 2009 1850 151.0 +2.02 +0.45 1.012 50.5% +25 -106 -16 53.8% +0.24 7–8 (47%) 14–11 (56%) 101.0 -0.82 2012 1657 148.5 -2.64 +2.36 1.001 50.1% -91 +97 -221 45.1% -0.02 8–6 (57%) 7–8 (47%) 103.8 +1.93
30 2010 1760 142.1 -0.13 0.00 1.000 50.0% +24 — — 49.4% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 5–6 (45%) 93.5 -0.97 2013 1827 157.9 +0.16 +1.05 1.028 50.1% -69 -10 -393 50.0% +0.15 8–8 (50%) 6–10 (38%) 99.6 -1.20
31 2011 1825 150.5 -0.14 -0.22 0.954 49.7% +33 — — 50.0% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) 99.3 -0.57 2014 1744 139.2 -1.96 +1.94 1.023 50.5% -88 +143 -297 48.1% -0.04 5–4 (56%) 6–4 (60%) 101.5 -0.42
32 2012 1781 139.4 -0.94 -0.30 0.965 49.4% +57 — — 45.5% -0.34 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) 94.5 +0.24 2015 1693 139.3 -0.88 +1.29 0.973 49.9% -34 +75 — 46.7% -0.53 3–5 (38%) 4–1 (80%) 100.5 -0.65
33 2013 1712 137.4 -1.34 +1.25 1.009 50.5% +56 — -13 42.1% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 3–8 (27%) 92.9 +0.69 2016 1735 126.6 -2.73 +1.14 0.930 49.0% — +95 — 36.4% -0.59 0–1 1–1 — -0.30
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1695 138.3 -3.23 +0.60 0.906 48.3% -51 +53 -241 40.7% -0.74 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.0 -0.39
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1667 119.0 -2.49 -0.73 0.689 44.3% — +27 — 20.0% -1.47 1–0 0–1 — -0.36
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1505 105.1 -3.42 -0.56 0.757 43.8% — +57 — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 0–1 — +0.25
Career — 2042 153.8 +1.56 +2.23 1.088 51.6% +35 -188 -160 57.2% +0.48 97–99 (49%) 127–119 (52%) 97.2 +1.00 — 1853 142.9 -2.37 +0.92 0.943 48.9% -77 +59 -245 42.0% -0.41 40–56 (42%) 47–55 (46%) 98.7 -0.22

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.