H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

James Blake vs Fabrice Santoro H2H: 5-1

James Blake holds a 5–1 lead over Fabrice Santoro in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, James Blake leads 5–1 on hard courts. Most recently, James Blake won the 2009 Paris Masters second round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Fabrice Santoro
FRA Age 53 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 10, 2009* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard James Blake #41 6-4 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #54 Match data
Apr 1, 2008* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard James Blake #9 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #49 Match data
Jan 10, 2008* Sydney ATP 250 R32 Hard Fabrice Santoro #37 7-6(4) 6-2 James Blake #13 Match data
Aug 30, 2007* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard James Blake #6 6-4 3-6 6-2 4-6 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #44 Match data
Aug 16, 2006* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard James Blake #5 6-4 6-4 Fabrice Santoro #47 Match data
Mar 20, 2002* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard James Blake #49 2-6 7-5 6-3 Fabrice Santoro #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,048 345 235 59.5% 0 0 0 0 10 10
Fabrice Santoro #142 #17 1,516 1,889 456 432 51.4% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age James Blake Fabrice Santoro
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1989 3–6 33.3% #235 1,509 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1990 15–16 48.4% #62 1,684 0 0
18 1998 0–1 0.0% #682 1,491 0 0 1991 26–21 55.3% #43 1,697 0 0
19 1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0 1992 25–22 53.2% #43 1,728 0 0
20 2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,452 0 0 1993 24–26 48.0% #55 1,628 0 0
21 2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0 1994 24–18 57.1% #46 1,734 0 0
22 2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1 1995 16–25 39.0% #102 1,609 0 0
23 2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,796 0 1 1996 6–12 33.3% #118 1,555 0 0
24 2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1 1997 32–23 58.2% #29 1,804 0 1
25 2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3 1998 27–27 50.0% #41 1,709 0 1
26 2006 57–21 73.1% #4 2,000 0 8 1999 36–25 59.0% #34 1,765 0 2
27 2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,911 0 10 2000 32–26 55.2% #31 1,727 0 3
28 2008 40–20 66.7% #10 1,888 0 10 2001 35–26 57.4% #22 1,769 0 3
29 2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,848 0 10 2002 27–25 51.9% #35 1,739 0 4
30 2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10 2003 17–21 44.7% #62 1,708 0 4
31 2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,841 0 10 2004 17–14 54.8% #52 1,817 0 4
32 2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,788 0 10 2005 18–19 48.6% #58 1,782 0 4
33 2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,714 0 10 2006 19–23 45.2% #52 1,700 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2007 24–19 55.8% #37 1,785 0 5
35 — — — — — — — 2008 18–17 51.4% #52 1,755 0 6
36 — — — — — — — 2009 15–20 42.9% #68 1,694 0 6
37 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #142 1,688 0 6