H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
James Blake vs Hyung-Taik Lee H2H: 2-0
James Blake holds a 2–0 lead over Hyung-Taik Lee in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, James Blake leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, James Blake won the 2007 Los Angeles semifinal 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
KOR
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 21, 2007* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | SF | Hard | James Blake | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2003* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | James Blake | 6-3 6-2 | Hyung-Taik Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Hyung-Taik Lee | #1,256 | #36 | 864 | 1,798 | 120 | 153 | 44.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| James Blake | Hyung-Taik Lee | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #283 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 7–4 | 63.6% | #90 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #116 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #87 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #56 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,668 | 0 | 1 |
| 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 | 2005 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #107 | 1,618 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 | 2006 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 | 2007 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #51 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 | 2008 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #107 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #871 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |