H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
James Blake vs Joachim Johansson H2H: 0-2
Joachim Johansson holds a 2–0 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Joachim Johansson leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Joachim Johansson won the 2004 Memphis fourth round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
SWE
Age 44
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2004* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Joachim Johansson | 6-3 6-3 | James Blake | Match data |
| Feb 13, 2004* | San Jose | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Joachim Johansson | 6-4 6-2 | James Blake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Joachim Johansson | #705 | #9 | 1,980 | 1,942 | 69 | 53 | 56.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | James Blake | Joachim Johansson | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #773 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #390 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #11 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #53 | 1,743 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #193 | 1,781 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #350 | 1,736 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 | 2008 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #771 | 1,738 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 | 2009 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #365 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #694 | 1,794 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |