H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
James Blake vs Julien Benneteau H2H: 2-2
James Blake and Julien Benneteau are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, James Blake leads 2–1 on hard courts, while Julien Benneteau leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, James Blake won the 2013 Miami Masters second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 44
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 23, 2013* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | James Blake | 6-2 6-3 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2010* | Eastbourne | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Julien Benneteau | 7-6(3) 7-5 | James Blake | Match data |
| Mar 28, 2009* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | James Blake | 6-4 6-4 | Julien Benneteau | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2007* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Julien Benneteau | 6-2 7-6(1) | James Blake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Julien Benneteau | #140 | #25 | 1,608 | 1,955 | 269 | 292 | 48.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | James Blake | Julien Benneteau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #271 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #253 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #138 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 | 2004 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #65 | 1,637 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2005 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #165 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #40 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 | 2007 | 22–28 | 44.0% | #68 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 | 2008 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #43 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 26–28 | 48.1% | #46 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #44 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,871 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #35 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #35 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #25 | 1,895 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #527 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #130 | 1,807 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,862 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #140 | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |