H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
James Blake vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-1
Lukasz Kubot holds a 1–0 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2010 Vienna third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 28, 2010* | Vienna | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 6-4 6-4 | James Blake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| James Blake | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |