H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
James Blake vs Marcos Baghdatis H2H: 1-2
Marcos Baghdatis holds a 2–1 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Marcos Baghdatis leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, James Blake won the 2011 Cincinnati Masters second round 3-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 46
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
CYP
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2011* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | James Blake | 3-6 6-3 6-2 | Marcos Baghdatis | Match data |
| Jun 22, 2011* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-4 6-2 6-7(5) 4-6 6-4 | James Blake | Match data |
| Feb 11, 2010* | Rotterdam | ATP 500 | R32 | Hard | Marcos Baghdatis | 6-4 6-2 | James Blake | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Blake | #1,020 | #4 | 3,550 | 2,048 | 345 | 235 | 59.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 10 |
| Marcos Baghdatis | #179 | #8 | 2,111 | 1,952 | 324 | 272 | 54.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | James Blake | Marcos Baghdatis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #682 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1999 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #219 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,452 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #55 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2001 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #73 | 1,647 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #12 | 1,842 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2002 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #28 | 1,815 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2003 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #37 | 1,796 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #98 | 1,815 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2004 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #97 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #42 | 1,810 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2005 | 34–20 | 63.0% | #23 | 1,924 | 0 | 3 | 2010 | 41–27 | 60.3% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2006 | 57–21 | 73.1% | #4 | 2,000 | 0 | 8 | 2011 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #44 | 1,844 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2007 | 49–21 | 70.0% | #13 | 1,911 | 0 | 10 | 2012 | 31–24 | 56.4% | #36 | 1,897 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2008 | 40–20 | 66.7% | #10 | 1,888 | 0 | 10 | 2013 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #87 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2009 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #44 | 1,848 | 0 | 10 | 2014 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #85 | 1,703 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 2010 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #135 | 1,759 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #46 | 1,869 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2011 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #59 | 1,841 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #36 | 1,884 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | 2012 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #127 | 1,788 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #102 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | 2013 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #153 | 1,714 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #124 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #179 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 |