H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

James Blake vs Vincent Spadea H2H: 3-6

Vincent Spadea holds a 6–3 lead over James Blake in their ATP head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, Vincent Spadea leads 5–3 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, James Blake won the 2009 San Jose round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

James Blake
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
3 – 6
9 main draw meetings
Vincent Spadea
USA Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
James Blake #11 6-3 6-4 Vincent Spadea #108 Match data Feb 12, 2009* R32 San Jose ATP 250 Hard
James Blake #9 7-6(2) 6-4 Vincent Spadea #62 Match data Jul 21, 2007* QF Los Angeles Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Vincent Spadea #21 7-6(6) 6-1 James Blake #155 Match data Feb 26, 2005* QF Scottsdale ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Vincent Spadea #19 6-3 6-0 James Blake #138 Match data Feb 11, 2005* R16 San Jose ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Vincent Spadea #24 6-3 6-1 James Blake #89 Match data Sep 17, 2004* R16 Delray Beach Open International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Vincent Spadea #36 6-7(12) 7-6(4) 6-1 James Blake #39 Match data Mar 23, 2004* R128 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Vincent Spadea #29 6-4 2-6 7-5 James Blake #37 Match data Mar 6, 2004* QF Scottsdale International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
James Blake #27 3-6 6-2 6-3 Vincent Spadea #56 Match data Oct 10, 2002* R32 Vienna Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Vincent Spadea #73 6-3 6-4 James Blake #36 Match data Jun 13, 2002* R32 Queen's Club Championships ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
James Blake #1,020 #4 3,550 2,041 349 237 59.6% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Vincent Spadea #1,474 #18 1,629 1,876 311 350 47.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

James Blake Vincent Spadea
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1998 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 0 1993 1–5 16.7% #303 1,482 0 0
1999 1–4 20.0% #219 1,479 0 0 1994 11–13 45.8% #75 1,561 0 0
2000 0–4 0.0% #212 1,453 0 0 1995 21–28 42.9% #81 1,639 0 0
2001 11–9 55.0% #73 1,647 0 0 1996 27–22 55.1% #54 1,711 0 0
2002 34–22 60.7% #28 1,815 0 1 1997 20–26 43.5% #88 1,695 0 0
2003 30–23 56.6% #37 1,794 0 1 1998 28–27 50.9% #42 1,753 0 0
2004 15–13 53.6% #97 1,692 0 1 1999 33–27 55.0% #20 1,763 0 0
2005 34–20 63.0% #23 1,924 0 3 2000 3–24 11.1% #213 1,540 0 0
2006 57–21 73.1% #4 1,999 0 8 2001 1–3 25.0% #125 1,530 0 0
2007 49–21 70.0% #13 1,916 0 10 2002 13–17 43.3% #67 1,622 0 0
2008 44–22 66.7% #10 1,883 0 10 2003 34–25 57.6% #29 1,723 0 0
2009 23–18 56.1% #44 1,849 0 10 2004 40–26 60.6% #20 1,783 0 1
2010 15–17 46.9% #135 1,759 0 10 2005 21–24 46.7% #75 1,665 0 1
2011 19–16 54.3% #59 1,824 0 10 2006 19–26 42.2% #73 1,626 0 1
2012 8–12 40.0% #127 1,781 0 10 2007 24–28 46.2% #77 1,651 0 1
2013 9–14 39.1% #153 1,711 0 10 2008 13–19 40.6% #76 1,643 0 1
— — — — — — — 2009 2–9 18.2% #295 1,520 0 1
— — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #1517 1,475 0 1

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

James Blake Vincent Spadea
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1993 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1999 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1994 5 6 11 45.5% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
2000 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 13 12 25 52.0% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2001 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1996 15 12 27 55.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
2002 21 12 33 63.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1997 15 13 28 53.6% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
2003 24 14 38 63.2% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 19 17 36 52.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
2004 12 9 21 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 17 12 29 58.6% 13 9 22 59.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
2005 28 13 41 68.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2000 1 15 16 6.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
2006 46 14 60 76.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
2007 40 15 55 72.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2002 8 9 17 47.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
2008 33 15 48 68.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2003 24 16 40 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
2009 13 11 24 54.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2004 24 14 38 63.2% 5 5 10 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
2010 15 15 30 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2005 14 17 31 45.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0%
2011 18 14 32 56.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 16 16 32 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
2012 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2007 16 19 35 45.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
2013 8 9 17 47.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 7 8 12.5% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 273 164 437 62.5% 39 39 78 50.0% 32 27 59 54.2% 5 7 12 41.7% Career 198 204 402 49.3% 68 84 152 44.7% 27 39 66 40.9% 18 23 41 43.9%

Performance Progression by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 563/586 of James Blake's and 604/661 of Vincent Spadea's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

James Blake Vincent Spadea
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
1998 1/1 8.0 7.0 49.1% 60.4% 47.3% 66.7% 15.4% 53.7% 34.4% 1993 6/6 2.3 4.2 49.5% 57.8% 42.6% 48.9% 47.3% 50.5% 38.6%
1999 5/5 3.6 4.4 54.3% 64.1% 45.3% 41.7% 36.7% 55.8% 31.8% 1994 19/24 2.0 2.0 56.3% 62.6% 45.0% 52.7% 37.8% 54.8% 40.6%
2000 4/4 3.3 3.0 48.4% 58.5% 30.3% 35.4% 54.5% 44.2% 38.6% 1995 43/49 3.1 1.7 57.3% 68.2% 51.1% 58.8% 44.4% 60.9% 40.7%
2001 17/20 5.7 2.5 59.8% 71.7% 54.9% 64.8% 42.6% 64.8% 37.2% 1996 42/49 3.5 1.3 61.8% 69.3% 54.4% 59.2% 44.6% 63.6% 41.2%
2002 50/56 4.5 2.5 58.7% 71.0% 51.7% 62.3% 44.2% 63.1% 39.2% 1997 38/46 3.9 2.5 55.0% 67.1% 50.9% 57.4% 48.6% 59.6% 38.0%
2003 52/53 5.2 3.0 60.2% 71.5% 51.7% 56.1% 48.8% 63.6% 40.7% 1998 47/55 2.4 1.5 66.4% 64.1% 52.2% 56.4% 46.9% 60.1% 37.8%
2004 28/28 4.8 2.4 60.2% 70.7% 51.0% 51.0% 36.6% 63.0% 39.1% 1999 53/60 4.9 1.9 53.1% 71.7% 52.3% 53.3% 48.4% 62.4% 40.6%
2005 54/54 6.6 2.4 58.6% 74.9% 53.7% 62.7% 41.6% 66.2% 39.7% 2000 22/27 3.9 4.1 51.9% 65.6% 46.4% 58.5% 42.0% 56.2% 34.0%
2006 77/78 6.1 2.7 57.5% 73.3% 53.3% 61.1% 44.9% 64.8% 41.9% 2001 3/4 3.7 7.7 52.6% 68.1% 46.9% 61.0% 28.5% 58.0% 35.1%
2007 67/70 7.4 2.9 57.8% 76.8% 54.8% 62.3% 47.5% 67.4% 39.1% 2002 26/30 5.0 6.2 54.9% 69.5% 51.9% 52.0% 37.4% 61.3% 37.1%
2008 59/66 7.0 2.6 55.7% 75.0% 52.5% 54.6% 46.8% 65.0% 39.6% 2003 56/59 3.8 4.2 54.0% 69.3% 51.6% 56.1% 54.1% 61.2% 39.7%
2009 41/41 6.3 3.0 57.3% 74.0% 53.5% 60.6% 41.0% 65.3% 35.1% 2004 64/66 4.2 2.5 59.3% 69.0% 53.8% 61.4% 42.9% 62.6% 39.2%
2010 32/32 5.2 2.8 57.4% 72.1% 52.4% 53.6% 37.7% 63.7% 36.3% 2005 45/45 3.1 3.4 56.4% 68.4% 49.1% 54.2% 46.3% 60.0% 39.3%
2011 33/35 5.5 3.8 57.7% 74.1% 47.4% 61.0% 46.0% 62.8% 35.5% 2006 45/45 3.3 2.9 57.7% 69.1% 50.3% 58.0% 38.6% 61.2% 40.8%
2012 20/20 5.4 3.1 56.9% 71.3% 49.4% 51.8% 46.5% 62.0% 36.7% 2007 52/52 3.0 2.1 61.9% 66.0% 53.2% 56.9% 45.7% 61.2% 37.3%
2013 23/23 6.0 2.7 53.4% 75.6% 48.6% 58.9% 49.1% 62.6% 37.7% 2008 31/32 3.7 3.0 58.1% 69.1% 49.9% 56.1% 45.4% 61.0% 35.2%
— —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 11/11 4.6 4.5 55.0% 66.0% 46.7% 50.5% 30.8% 56.7% 32.3%
— —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 5.0 6.0 57.7% 63.3% 36.4% 20.0% — 51.9% 19.5%
Career 563/586 6.0 2.8 57.7% 73.3% 52.1% 58.7% 44.5% 64.3% 38.8% Career 604/661 3.6 2.8 57.6% 68.0% 51.2% 56.6% 44.9% 60.7% 38.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

James Blake Vincent Spadea
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1998 1492 98.2 +0.92 -1.01 0.743 44.6% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.01 1993 1483 111.6 -2.02 +0.71 0.780 44.9% +25 — — 35.7% -1.00 0–2 1–0 — -0.51
1999 1480 105.6 -2.20 -0.63 0.718 44.0% +30 — — 16.7% -2.42 1–0 0–1 — -0.11 1994 1562 128.2 -4.35 +0.98 0.897 47.7% -7 -11 — 49.1% -0.12 3–4 (43%) 3–3 (50%) — +0.31
2000 1453 104.3 -4.21 +0.21 0.692 41.4% +17 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — -0.23 1995 1640 140.5 -0.53 +2.71 1.040 50.5% +51 -56 -95 46.2% -0.02 3–8 (27%) 5–6 (45%) — -1.18
2001 1647 135.3 +2.25 +0.39 1.059 51.0% -18 — -87 55.1% +0.55 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) — +0.08 1996 1712 143.3 +1.24 +2.99 1.130 52.3% +32 -80 -144 55.5% +0.52 3–10 (23%) 12–13 (48%) — -0.21
2002 1816 147.9 +1.40 +2.12 1.061 51.1% -26 -178 -199 56.1% +0.32 11–10 (52%) 9–7 (56%) — -0.19 1997 1695 132.3 -1.99 +0.58 0.942 49.0% +54 -90 -177 44.2% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 8–13 (38%) — +0.15
2003 1794 146.7 +1.54 +3.57 1.120 52.2% +27 -165 -202 58.3% +0.52 6–12 (33%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.97 1998 1754 142.9 -1.19 +1.36 0.948 49.0% +12 -114 -242 48.9% -0.21 11–9 (55%) 11–7 (61%) — -1.59
2004 1692 126.8 -0.56 +1.37 1.056 50.9% +63 -67 — 55.1% +0.38 3–4 (43%) 7–3 (70%) — +2.11 1999 1764 147.3 +0.64 +3.01 1.078 51.4% 0 +23 — 52.6% +0.40 11–8 (58%) 12–17 (41%) — -2.07
2005 1925 148.8 +3.11 +2.61 1.175 52.6% +27 -259 -338 61.2% +0.81 8–9 (47%) 10–15 (40%) — -1.49 2000 1541 116.0 -3.77 -2.37 0.776 45.7% +4 +136 -111 25.7% -1.37 2–10 (17%) 1–5 (17%) — -1.41
2006 2000 158.3 +2.59 +5.15 1.189 53.1% +48 -316 -257 64.5% +0.91 17–8 (68%) 18–14 (56%) — +0.23 2001 1530 100.5 -1.18 -1.97 0.837 46.8% +9 — — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 — — -0.11
2007 1917 151.1 +3.35 +2.66 1.201 53.1% +45 -237 -153 66.3% +1.01 12–9 (57%) 20–16 (56%) — +3.66 2002 1623 124.7 -0.85 -0.17 0.959 49.0% -26 +7 -149 44.3% -0.30 5–3 (63%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.52
2008 1883 152.4 +2.01 +2.91 1.131 52.4% +72 -189 -110 61.9% +0.79 13–11 (54%) 12–11 (52%) — +4.15 2003 1724 136.8 -0.66 +1.93 1.022 50.6% +8 -47 — 51.0% +0.20 14–4 (78%) 3–11 (21%) — +3.85
2009 1850 151.0 +2.02 +0.45 1.012 50.5% +25 -106 -16 53.8% +0.24 7–8 (47%) 14–11 (56%) — -0.82 2004 1783 145.9 -0.01 +2.69 1.050 51.0% +7 -99 -180 57.4% +0.58 17–7 (71%) 10–14 (42%) — +0.56
2010 1760 142.1 -0.13 0.00 1.000 50.0% +24 — — 49.4% -0.01 6–9 (40%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.97 2005 1666 133.6 -2.19 +2.07 0.982 49.7% -7 +10 +9 49.5% -0.01 7–8 (47%) 7–4 (64%) — +1.81
2011 1825 150.5 -0.14 -0.22 0.954 49.7% +33 — — 50.0% -0.01 6–5 (55%) 7–8 (47%) — -0.57 2006 1627 135.4 -0.44 +2.72 1.054 51.1% +39 -19 -31 42.6% -0.10 6–10 (38%) 4–13 (24%) — +0.49
2012 1781 139.4 -0.94 -0.30 0.965 49.4% +57 — — 45.5% -0.34 2–6 (25%) 4–5 (44%) — +0.24 2007 1651 138.5 -1.80 +0.82 0.961 49.3% +13 -57 -80 44.9% -0.17 10–5 (67%) 10–9 (53%) — -2.61
2013 1712 137.4 -1.34 +1.25 1.009 50.5% +56 — -13 42.1% +0.04 2–4 (33%) 3–8 (27%) — +0.69 2008 1644 128.2 -2.08 -1.45 0.903 48.3% +10 -100 +32 42.9% -0.46 6–7 (46%) 5–8 (38%) — +0.90
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1521 107.0 -4.53 -2.50 0.746 44.4% +14 — +119 19.2% -1.92 1–0 0–2 — +0.54
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1475 95.4 -1.09 -2.14 0.406 37.6% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — +0.14
Career 2042 153.8 +1.56 +2.23 1.088 51.6% +35 -188 -160 57.2% +0.48 97–99 (49%) 127–119 (52%) 97.2 +1.00 Career 1877 141.6 -1.05 +1.51 0.987 49.8% +15 -37 -86 47.2% -0.06 108–104 (51%) 98–134 (42%) 95.1 -0.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.