H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
James Duckworth vs Jarkko Nieminen H2H: 1-2
Jarkko Nieminen holds a 2–1 lead over James Duckworth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jarkko Nieminen leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, James Duckworth won the 2015 Brisbane fourth round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 34
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FIN
Age 44
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2015* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | James Duckworth | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Jarkko Nieminen | Match data |
| Jan 1, 2014* | Brisbane | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-2 6-3 | James Duckworth | Match data |
| Jan 12, 2012* | Sydney | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jarkko Nieminen | 6-2 6-2 | James Duckworth | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Duckworth | #74 | #46 | 1,244 | 1,799 | 76 | 128 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jarkko Nieminen | #1,029 | #13 | 1,700 | 1,917 | 357 | 334 | 51.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | James Duckworth | Jarkko Nieminen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #308 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–1 | 80.0% | #61 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 25–26 | 49.0% | #40 | 1,703 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 37–29 | 56.1% | #36 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #127 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #77 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 49–27 | 64.5% | #15 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #37 | 1,758 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #88 | 1,712 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,873 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #77 | 1,830 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #155 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,744 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 27–26 | 50.9% | #39 | 1,789 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | 2024 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #73 | 1,767 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2025 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #153 | 1,692 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |