H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
James Duckworth vs Juan Monaco H2H: 0-1
Juan Monaco holds a 1–0 lead over James Duckworth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Juan Monaco leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Juan Monaco won the 2016 Tokyo fourth round 7-6(3) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 34
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2016* | Tokyo | ATP 500 | R16 | Hard | Juan Monaco | 7-6(3) 6-3 | James Duckworth | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Duckworth | #74 | #46 | 1,244 | 1,799 | 76 | 128 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Juan Monaco | #226 | #10 | 2,775 | 2,046 | 319 | 256 | 55.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | James Duckworth | Juan Monaco | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 16–12 | 57.1% | #73 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #85 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #127 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #69 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #23 | 1,864 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2016 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #46 | 1,768 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,850 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,838 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #26 | 1,932 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #12 | 1,944 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #42 | 1,809 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #155 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 20–18 | 52.6% | #62 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #53 | 1,811 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | 2024 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #65 | 1,864 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | 2025 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #226 | 1,805 | 0 | 8 |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |