H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
James Duckworth vs Malek Jaziri H2H: 1-0
James Duckworth holds a 1–0 lead over Malek Jaziri in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, James Duckworth leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, James Duckworth won the 2015 Wimbledon first round 7-6(2) 6-2 3-6 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 34
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
TUN
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2015* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | James Duckworth | 7-6(2) 6-2 3-6 3-6 7-5 | Malek Jaziri | Match data |
| Oct 5, 2014 | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Malek Jaziri | 6-4 6-4 | James Duckworth | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Duckworth | #74 | #46 | 1,244 | 1,799 | 76 | 128 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Malek Jaziri | #1,645 | #42 | 1,042 | 1,843 | 83 | 134 | 38.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | James Duckworth | Malek Jaziri | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #127 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2016 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #155 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #76 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #103 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2024 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #58 | 1,725 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | 2025 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #98 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #45 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 6–17 | 26.1% | #201 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #249 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #312 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #433 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1645 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |