H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 16:32 UTC
James Duckworth vs Taro Daniel H2H: 1-0
James Duckworth holds a 1–0 lead over Taro Daniel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, James Duckworth leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, James Duckworth won the 2020 Pune fourth round 6-7(4) 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 34
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Japan
Age 33
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 17, 2025* | Chengdu Open | ATP 250 | Q1 | Hard | Taro Daniel | 7-6 7-6 | James Duckworth | Match data |
| Feb 7, 2020* | Pune | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | James Duckworth | 6-7(4) 7-6(6) 6-3 | Taro Daniel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Duckworth | #74 | #46 | 1,244 | 1,799 | 76 | 128 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Taro Daniel | #194 | #58 | 893 | 1,815 | 81 | 146 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | James Duckworth | Taro Daniel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #177 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #127 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #96 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #127 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2016 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #99 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #77 | 1,710 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #110 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #117 | 1,595 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #125 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #92 | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #155 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #75 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 10–23 | 30.3% | #84 | 1,631 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2024 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #376 | 1,503 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2025 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,538 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |