H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
James Duckworth vs Thiago Seyboth Wild H2H: 0-1
Thiago Seyboth Wild holds a 1–0 lead over James Duckworth in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Thiago Seyboth Wild leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Thiago Seyboth Wild won the 2024 Winston-Salem second round 3-6 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Australia
Age 34
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Brazil
Age 26
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 20, 2024* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Thiago Seyboth Wild | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | James Duckworth | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James Duckworth | #74 | #46 | 1,244 | 1,799 | 76 | 128 | 37.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Thiago Seyboth Wild | #284 | #58 | 855 | 1,775 | 38 | 50 | 43.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | James Duckworth | Thiago Seyboth Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #449 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #211 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #116 | 1,537 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2013 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #136 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #131 | 1,545 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2014 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #127 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #417 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #120 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2023 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #79 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2016 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,704 | 0 | 0 | 2024 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #74 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | 2025 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #217 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2018 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #234 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 | 2026 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2019 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #100 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2020 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #49 | 1,791 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2022 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #155 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2023 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #116 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #82 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2025 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #87 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #74 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |