H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jamie Morgan vs Andrei Olhovskiy H2H: 1-0
Jamie Morgan holds a 1–0 lead over Andrei Olhovskiy in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jamie Morgan leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jamie Morgan won the 1992 Taipei semifinal 6-7(7) 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
RUS
Age 60
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 1992* | Taipei | ATP 250 | SF | Carpet | Jamie Morgan | 6-7(7) 7-5 7-5 | Andrei Olhovskiy | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamie Morgan | #1,293 | #52 | 732 | 1,756 | 60 | 80 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Andrei Olhovskiy | #1,310 | #49 | 690 | 1,750 | 113 | 162 | 41.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jamie Morgan | Andrei Olhovskiy | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #491 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #183 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #113 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #232 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #64 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #302 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #145 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #148 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1229 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #136 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #80 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 26–29 | 47.3% | #65 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #97 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #118 | 1,586 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #90 | 1,675 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–14 | 0.0% | #442 | 1,480 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1256 | 1,470 | 0 | 2 |