H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jamie Morgan vs David Prinosil H2H: 1-1
Jamie Morgan and David Prinosil are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 1993 Hong Kong third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 1993* | Hong Kong | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | David Prinosil | 6-4 6-3 | Jamie Morgan | Match data |
| Apr 7, 1993* | Tokyo Outdoor | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Jamie Morgan | 6-3 2-6 6-3 | David Prinosil | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamie Morgan | #1,293 | #52 | 732 | 1,756 | 60 | 80 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jamie Morgan | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #491 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #183 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #113 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #64 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #145 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1229 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |