H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jamie Morgan vs Mark Knowles H2H: 1-0
Jamie Morgan holds a 1–0 lead over Mark Knowles in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jamie Morgan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jamie Morgan won the 1993 Cincinnati Masters second round 2-6 6-1 7-6(6).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BAH
Age 54
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 1993* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jamie Morgan | 2-6 6-1 7-6(6) | Mark Knowles | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jamie Morgan | #1,293 | #52 | 732 | 1,756 | 60 | 80 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mark Knowles | #1,400 | #96 | 484 | 1,623 | 23 | 51 | 31.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jamie Morgan | Mark Knowles | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #728 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #491 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #430 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #338 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #291 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #183 | 1,414 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #258 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #113 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #64 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #231 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #104 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #139 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #145 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1229 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #363 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #273 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #223 | 1,456 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #350 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |