H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Jamie Morgan vs Mark Woodforde H2H: 2-0

Jamie Morgan holds a 2–0 lead over Mark Woodforde in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jamie Morgan leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jamie Morgan won the 1993 Queen's Club Championships round of 16 6-4 1-6 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jamie Morgan
AUS Age 55 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Mark Woodforde
AUS Age 60 Left-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jamie Morgan #83 6-4 1-6 8-6 Mark Woodforde #22 Match data Jun 11, 1993* R16 Queen's Club Championships ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Grass
Jamie Morgan #161 6-2 6-4 Mark Woodforde #54 Match data Aug 28, 1992* R16 Schenectady ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jamie Morgan #1,293 #52 732 1,755 60 80 42.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mark Woodforde #985 #19 1,291 1,921 313 294 51.6% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jamie Morgan Mark Woodforde
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #491 1,490 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 0–2 0.0% #338 1,467 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 0–1 0.0% #179 1,460 0 0 1985 6–4 60.0% #127 1,578 0 0
20 1991 1–8 11.1% #183 1,414 0 0 1986 11–14 44.0% #181 1,547 0 1
21 1992 9–5 64.3% #113 1,587 0 0 1987 12–13 48.0% #67 1,648 0 1
22 1993 24–25 49.0% #64 1,737 0 0 1988 31–23 57.4% #42 1,802 0 2
23 1994 17–20 45.9% #104 1,585 0 0 1989 20–15 57.1% #75 1,714 0 3
24 1995 9–17 34.6% #145 1,534 0 0 1990 12–12 50.0% #101 1,718 0 3
25 1996 0–1 0.0% #1229 1,521 0 0 1991 12–21 36.4% #88 1,632 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1992 27–23 54.0% #40 1,812 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1993 28–20 58.3% #28 1,792 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1994 29–23 55.8% #43 1,792 0 4
29 — — — — — — — 1995 31–25 55.4% #51 1,761 0 4
30 — — — — — — — 1996 32–25 56.1% #27 1,803 0 4
31 — — — — — — — 1997 24–26 48.0% #46 1,735 0 4
32 — — — — — — — 1998 25–24 51.0% #58 1,747 0 4
33 — — — — — — — 1999 10–19 34.5% #130 1,609 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2000 3–7 30.0% #321 1,583 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jamie Morgan Mark Woodforde
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1991 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
21 1992 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — 4 1 5 80.0% 1987 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1993 17 16 33 51.5% 0 4 4 0.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 23 10 33 69.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 1994 8 11 19 42.1% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1989 17 8 25 68.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 6 7 13 46.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1990 8 8 16 50.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1996 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1991 7 11 18 38.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 15 12 27 55.6% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 15 12 27 55.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 4 13 69.2%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 14 10 24 58.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 14 12 26 53.8% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 22 13 35 62.9% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 13 14 27 48.1% 5 4 9 55.6% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 7 13 20 35.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 37 48 85 43.5% 7 12 19 36.8% 10 11 21 47.6% 6 9 15 40.0% — 179 153 332 53.9% 41 54 95 43.2% 48 43 91 52.7% 45 44 89 50.6%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 114/136 of Jamie Morgan's and 380/434 of Mark Woodforde's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Jamie Morgan Mark Woodforde
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 9/9 3.4 2.1 69.0% 64.3% 47.4% 59.4% 35.4% 58.6% 29.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 11/14 7.4 2.6 60.1% 75.4% 50.7% 62.2% 39.4% 65.6% 35.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 42/49 9.3 4.4 56.0% 76.4% 50.2% 57.4% 35.6% 64.9% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 29/37 9.7 4.4 57.4% 74.5% 47.7% 52.4% 32.4% 62.7% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 1995 22/26 8.5 5.3 53.7% 76.1% 50.3% 54.3% 33.7% 64.0% 35.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 1996 1/1 8.0 3.0 59.6% 74.6% 40.0% 16.7% 100.0% 60.6% 23.0% 1991 29/33 2.5 3.0 55.8% 65.5% 47.4% 50.6% 38.5% 57.4% 37.7%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1992 45/50 4.4 3.2 58.7% 72.6% 48.1% 59.0% 42.7% 62.7% 39.2%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1993 44/48 4.5 3.3 56.8% 71.9% 50.1% 65.2% 46.4% 62.2% 39.5%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1994 44/52 4.4 3.3 53.5% 72.9% 53.2% 58.2% 39.2% 63.6% 39.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1995 53/56 4.4 3.8 57.5% 72.8% 51.7% 55.9% 37.9% 63.5% 40.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1996 49/57 5.2 3.8 58.4% 73.8% 50.2% 65.5% 46.4% 64.0% 37.5%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 41/50 5.7 4.1 58.5% 71.7% 47.3% 60.7% 41.1% 61.2% 38.6%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 40/49 5.0 3.8 55.1% 73.1% 48.5% 58.7% 44.8% 62.1% 36.4%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 27/29 5.4 3.0 62.9% 67.2% 48.5% 57.7% 42.1% 59.9% 36.6%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 8/10 2.4 3.5 57.8% 64.1% 49.6% 52.0% 35.6% 58.2% 37.6%
Career — 114/140 8.6 4.2 57.4% 74.8% 49.3% 55.8% 35.3% 63.7% 34.6% — 380/607 4.6 3.5 57.3% 71.6% 49.7% 59.3% 42.1% 62.1% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jamie Morgan Mark Woodforde
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1491 102.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1467 102.4 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1461 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.09 1985 1579 111.5 — — — — -12 — +27 58.6% +0.41 1–2 (33%) 3–2 (60%) 98.8 +1.07
20 1991 1415 97.1 -1.97 -4.00 0.721 44.7% +36 — — 19.0% -2.00 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.21 1986 1547 116.0 — — — — +33 -49 +94 41.7% -0.80 3–3 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 102.1 +1.28
21 1992 1588 128.4 +0.95 -0.03 1.018 49.8% +26 — — 58.3% +0.14 4–2 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.1 +0.40 1987 1648 124.1 — — — — +11 -154 -35 49.3% +0.15 6–5 (55%) 4–5 (44%) 101.9 +0.67
22 1993 1737 134.0 +2.51 -2.93 0.959 49.3% -28 -254 -92 48.5% -0.10 10–9 (53%) 13–10 (57%) 105.8 -0.49 1988 1802 150.3 — — — — +12 -238 -103 56.2% +0.39 9–9 (50%) 8–7 (53%) 104.5 -2.00
23 1994 1586 121.5 +0.23 -1.73 0.988 49.9% -15 -47 +88 47.3% +0.11 8–7 (53%) 5–10 (33%) 97.7 +2.93 1989 1715 129.3 — — — — +66 -145 -42 53.1% +0.08 7–6 (54%) 7–8 (47%) 99.1 +1.09
24 1995 1534 122.0 +1.21 -1.34 0.990 50.0% +39 -31 +85 37.9% -0.39 4–5 (44%) 4–9 (31%) 95.4 -0.02 1990 1718 128.5 — — — — +12 — +3 50.0% -0.05 3–2 (60%) 1–5 (17%) 97.3 -0.18
25 1996 1521 101.7 -0.77 -0.40 0.584 43.0% — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — -0.03 1991 1633 130.1 -2.30 -0.49 0.885 47.4% +67 -69 — 36.9% -0.96 5–3 (63%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.26
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1813 146.1 +1.29 +1.66 1.050 50.8% +8 -233 -144 53.6% +0.17 6–10 (38%) 14–9 (61%) 101.0 -3.48
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1793 147.8 +1.20 +1.32 1.046 50.8% +19 -190 -121 56.7% +0.46 9–7 (56%) 8–7 (53%) 100.4 -0.21
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1793 144.0 +2.05 +1.57 1.087 51.3% +8 -106 -143 54.0% +0.28 7–4 (64%) 9–9 (50%) 101.3 -1.31
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1761 143.4 +1.40 +2.84 1.115 51.5% -7 -71 -60 57.0% +0.31 6–9 (40%) 12–10 (55%) 96.4 -2.71
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1803 152.4 +2.11 +1.19 1.039 51.0% +37 -161 -119 53.2% +0.43 11–9 (55%) 11–14 (44%) 99.0 -3.08
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1736 142.0 -0.58 +1.92 0.993 49.9% +5 -6 +26 51.5% +0.08 6–10 (38%) 11–9 (55%) 98.9 -0.85
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1748 139.4 +0.21 -0.55 0.962 49.2% -9 -86 +48 52.0% +0.15 8–10 (44%) 7–10 (41%) 93.9 -0.36
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1610 125.8 -1.05 -0.14 0.914 48.2% +18 +2 +120 39.5% -0.32 6–7 (46%) 4–11 (27%) 93.5 -0.93
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1584 116.0 -0.30 +0.27 0.898 47.9% +5 — — 45.8% -0.29 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -0.24
Career — 1756 128.4 +1.15 -2.10 0.953 49.2% -2 -85 +12 44.1% -0.27 26–26 (50%) 29–36 (45%) 100.7 +2.06 — 1921 146.3 +0.70 +1.19 1.018 50.2% +18 -119 -13 51.6% +0.11 93–99 (48%) 111–116 (49%) 97.4 -2.06

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.