H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Jan Apell vs David Rikl H2H: 2-0
Jan Apell holds a 2–0 lead over David Rikl in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jan Apell leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jan Apell won the 1994 Los Angeles third round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 56
Left-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 55
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 1994* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Jan Apell | 6-3 6-1 | David Rikl | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1994* | Miami Masters | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Jan Apell | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | David Rikl | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Apell | #835 | #62 | 670 | 1,770 | 44 | 67 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| David Rikl | #852 | #41 | 809 | 1,685 | 53 | 92 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Apell | David Rikl | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #656 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #313 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1990 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #200 | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #163 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #171 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #151 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1992 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #152 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #95 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1993 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #152 | 1,442 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–28 | 40.4% | #80 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1994 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #95 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #83 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1995 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #86 | 1,737 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #150 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1996 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #298 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #173 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #245 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1998 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #251 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #868 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #766 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |