H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jan Gunnarsson vs Fernando Luna H2H: 0-3
Fernando Luna holds a 3–0 lead over Jan Gunnarsson in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Fernando Luna leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Fernando Luna won the 1986 Barcelona third round 6-2 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 68
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 25, 1986* | Barcelona | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Fernando Luna | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Jan Gunnarsson | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1985* | Nice | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Luna | 6-7 7-6 6-0 | Jan Gunnarsson | Match data |
| Sep 23, 1983* | Bordeaux | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Fernando Luna | 6-3 6-3 | Jan Gunnarsson | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Gunnarsson | #774 | #25 | 579 | 1,822 | 190 | 203 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Fernando Luna | #723 | #33 | 310 | 1,777 | 167 | 160 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Gunnarsson | Fernando Luna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #389 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #274 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #250 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #340 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #87 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 18–13 | 58.1% | #66 | 1,707 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 1981 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #81 | 1,695 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1982 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #60 | 1,728 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1987 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #53 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #70 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #111 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 19–14 | 57.6% | #52 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1991 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #94 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #261 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #296 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #135 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #110 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |