H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Jan Gunnarsson vs Paul Annacone H2H: 1-1
Jan Gunnarsson and Paul Annacone are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Paul Annacone leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jan Gunnarsson leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paul Annacone won the 1989 Vienna fourth round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 64
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 63
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 1989* | Vienna | ATP 250 | R16 | Carpet | Paul Annacone | 6-1 7-5 | Jan Gunnarsson | Match data |
| Nov 4, 1988* | Stockholm | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Jan Gunnarsson | 6-2 6-2 | Paul Annacone | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan Gunnarsson | #774 | #25 | 579 | 1,822 | 190 | 203 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Paul Annacone | #1,209 | #12 | 430 | 1,966 | 160 | 131 | 55.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jan Gunnarsson | Paul Annacone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #389 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1980 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #274 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1981 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #96 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #389 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1983 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #99 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #94 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1984 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #48 | 1,726 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 45–19 | 70.3% | #13 | 1,903 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1985 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #25 | 1,797 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #43 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #57 | 1,748 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 29–20 | 59.2% | #32 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1987 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #39 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,787 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1988 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #84 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,732 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1989 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #165 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1990 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #433 | 1,630 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1991 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #94 | 1,643 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #225 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #296 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #813 | 1,576 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 1993 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #511 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |